It was an amazing fight why are you guys argueing over trivial points?

[Andre]

still havent seen the fight but did Marquez won 7 rounds clearly? i mean absolutely CLEAR CLEAR 7 rounds ??

because the way things are. even rounds goes to the aggressor/champion fighter.

like if MARQUEZ ABSOLUTELY DOMINATED 5 rounds and each of the 7 rounds were EVEN. PAC wouldhave still won 115-113 ( 10 POINT 'MUST' )

sorry cant resist posting

Not many rounds were clear as a bell mate. close fight but you will see Manny misses alot of shots and its through Marquez's skills that he does. JMM's shots are cleaner every time they land. Still to be fair you can count the hard shots on one hand and mostly one or the other fighter is only up by one or two shots each round.

I just watched it again and pretended I wanted Manny to win and looked harder at him and ignoring Juan more and I still got Juan winning it by one.
Manny looks busier (hectic at times in the last three rounds) but isnt landing as clean as Juan during the whole fight.

[miron_lang]

still havent seen the fight but did Marquez won 7 rounds clearly? i mean absolutely CLEAR CLEAR 7 rounds ??

because the way things are. even rounds goes to the aggressor/champion fighter.

like if MARQUEZ ABSOLUTELY DOMINATED 5 rounds and each of the 7 rounds were EVEN. PAC wouldhave still won 115-113 ( 10 POINT 'MUST' )

sorry cant resist posting

Not many rounds were clear as a bell mate. close fight but you will see Manny misses alot of shots and its through Marquez's skills that he does. JMM's shots are cleaner every time they land. Still to be fair you can count the hard shots on one hand and mostly one or the other fighter is only up by one or two shots each round.

I just watched it again and pretended I wanted Manny to win and looked harder at him and ignoring Juan more and I still got Juan winning it by one.
Manny looks busier (hectic at times in the last three rounds) but isnt landing as clean as Juan during the whole fight.

Thanks mate. im downloading the fight right now. im sure i'll find 7 rounds to give to Manny because most of them are close. lol

[ElTerribleMorales]

Miron needs to stop smoking the ganja, "the even rounds MUST go to Pacquiao cause he's the champion" complete bullshit lol

[miron_lang]

Miron needs to stop smoking the ganja, "the even rounds MUST go to Pacquiao cause he's the champion" complete bullshit lol

and the aggressor


ive been hearing this since i was little.

"The Chalenger should beat the champion convincingly"







My DL is 38% cant wait and yeah i miss the Ganja

[ElTerribleMorales]

Miron needs to stop smoking the ganja, "the even rounds MUST go to Pacquiao cause he's the champion" complete bullshit lol

and the aggressor


ive been hearing this since i was little.

"The Chalenger should beat the champion convincingly"







My DL is 38% cant wait and yeah i miss the Ganja

boxing is scored on clean effective punching, which Marquez did all night, even more so than Pacquiao, the challenger went beyond what he had to to "beat" the champion convincingly, fuck me if now to beat the "champion" you have to clean his fucking clock

[miron_lang]

boxing is scored on clean effective punching, which Marquez did all night, even more so than Pacquiao, the challenger went beyond what he had to to "beat" the champion convincingly, fuck me if now to beat the "champion" you have to clean his fucking clock

I am not talking about Pac-JMM 3. but the usual judging of today.

10-10 is discouraged and judges are encouraged to have a winner in each round.

sample were Tarver-JonesJr I

Tarver's rounds were clear but there were many close rounds that went to Roy. That's why the crowd booed.

IF JMM CLEALRLY WON 7 rounds as in crystal clear then you have an argument for robbery but even if you have 8 or 9 'closely contested' rounds for JMM then its not a robbery but a close fight.


Did you score 7 CLEAR rounds for JMM? this is a legit question.

[ElTerribleMorales]

boxing is scored on clean effective punching, which Marquez did all night, even more so than Pacquiao, the challenger went beyond what he had to to "beat" the champion convincingly, fuck me if now to beat the "champion" you have to clean his fucking clock

I am not talking about Pac-JMM 3. but the usual judging of today.

10-10 is discouraged and judges are encouraged to have a winner in each round.

sample were Tarver-JonesJr I

Tarver's rounds were clear but there were many close rounds that went to Roy. That's why the crowd booed.

IF JMM CLEALRLY WON 7 rounds as in crystal clear then you have an argument for robbery but even if you have 8 or 9 'closely contested' rounds for JMM then its not a robbery but a close fight.


Did you score 7 CLEAR rounds for JMM? this is a legit question.

i had Marquez winning 8 rounds to 4

[LobowolfXXX]

Miron needs to stop smoking the ganja, "the even rounds MUST go to Pacquiao cause he's the champion" complete bullshit lol

and the aggressor


ive been hearing this since i was little.

"The Chalenger should beat the champion convincingly"







My DL is 38% cant wait and yeah i miss the Ganja

The champion edge is a cliche, and does happen, but it's not good (or legal) judging. The aggressor part is.