Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[ElTerribleMorales]

That is a genious post miron_lang. You did not render an opinion but came up with a solid conclusion based on available evidence. Nobody can argue with that.

i'm pretty sure a person who can't spell the word genius would think that a pointless thread such as this one would also be in fact genius

[InTheNeutralCorner]

That is a genious post miron_lang. You did not render an opinion but came up with a solid conclusion based on available evidence. Nobody can argue with that.

i'm pretty sure a person who can't spell the word genius would think that a pointless thread such as this one would also be in fact genius

And you didn't even think that could have been a typographical error. If you look at your keypad, the 'i' is next to the 'o'. As if you have not committed any errors in spelling.

Maybe you can tell us which rounds you think are clearly for Marquez and only a fool will score that for Pacquiao.

[Pugilistic]

There was close rounds that could of went either way but to give Pacquiao a win i think a judge would have to give Pacquiao all of the close rounds.

I think Pacquiao did enough to get a draw but a win ? i don't think so.

Most rounds were competitive but Marquez got the better of them in most in them based on his cleaner harder shots and the fight was fought at a Marquez pace for the most part.

Pacquiao did enough to win the 1st and 2nd fights like Marquez did but i just can't see how you could have Pacquiao winning this 3rd fight.

[miron_lang]

There was close rounds that could of went either way but to give Pacquiao a win i think a judge would have to give Pacquiao all of the close rounds.

I think Pacquiao did enough to get a draw but a win ? i don't think so.

Most rounds were competitive but Marquez got the better of them in most in them based on his cleaner harder shots and the fight was fought at a Marquez pace for the most part.

Pacquiao did enough to win the 1st and 2nd fights like Marquez did but i just can't see how you could have Pacquiao winning this 3rd fight.

You're evaluating the fight in its entirety. Judges do it round by round.

If you look at the whole content. then there's no doubt about it Marquez won. but that's not the way judges score it.

[Pugilistic]

There was close rounds that could of went either way but to give Pacquiao a win i think a judge would have to give Pacquiao all of the close rounds.

I think Pacquiao did enough to get a draw but a win ? i don't think so.

Most rounds were competitive but Marquez got the better of them in most in them based on his cleaner harder shots and the fight was fought at a Marquez pace for the most part.

Pacquiao did enough to win the 1st and 2nd fights like Marquez did but i just can't see how you could have Pacquiao winning this 3rd fight.

You're evaluating the fight in its entirety. Judges do it round by round.

If you look at the whole content. then there's no doubt about it Marquez won. but that's not the way judges score it.

I watched the fight from rounds 1-12 and i had Marquez winning more rounds.

Every fan judges a fight round by round then evaluates there scores at the end. The fight as a whole was a win for Marquez.

The fact you have to twist and take other fight fans scores and mix them up to get a Pacquiao win is a joke.

The point is those 5 posters (including me) had Marquez winning. Not Pacquiao.

[miron_lang]

The fact you have to twist and take other fight fans scores and mix them up to get a Pacquiao win is a joke.

The point is those 5 posters (including me) had Marquez winning. Not Pacquiao.

I am not twisting anything. I got the data from the 5 of you.


and its SHOWS that 9 ROunds were not CLEAR


If 9 ROUNDS werent clear. some of the judges can see it for Pacquiao as they did.

[Pugilistic]

The fact you have to twist and take other fight fans scores and mix them up to get a Pacquiao win is a joke.

The point is those 5 posters (including me) had Marquez winning. Not Pacquiao.

I am not twisting anything. I got the data from the 5 of you.


and its SHOWS that 9 ROunds were not CLEAR


If 9 ROUNDS werent clear. some of the judges can see it for Pacquiao as they did.

So according to the results you displayed us 5 posters agreed that 9 rounds were up for debate but that means there was 3 rounds Marquez definitely won which means he only needs another 4 rounds for a win.

To give Pacquiao a win it would mean giving him all the close rounds.

[FinitoElDinamita]

There was close rounds that could of went either way but to give Pacquiao a win i think a judge would have to give Pacquiao all of the close rounds.

I think Pacquiao did enough to get a draw but a win ? i don't think so.

Most rounds were competitive but Marquez got the better of them in most in them based on his cleaner harder shots and the fight was fought at a Marquez pace for the most part.

Pacquiao did enough to win the 1st and 2nd fights like Marquez did but i just can't see how you could have Pacquiao winning this 3rd fight.

You're evaluating the fight in its entirety. Judges do it round by round.

If you look at the whole content. then there's no doubt about it Marquez won. but that's not the way judges score it.

I watched the fight from rounds 1-12 and i had Marquez winning more rounds.

Every fan judges a fight round by round then evaluates there scores at the end. The fight as a whole was a win for Marquez.

The fact you have to twist and take other fight fans scores and mix them up to get a Pacquiao win is a joke.

The point is those 5 posters (including me) had Marquez winning. Not Pacquiao.

lol Pwned again.. pactards are used to getting shown up..

These guys do not understand logics, point blank.

[miron_lang]

lol Pwned again.. pactards are used to getting shown up..

These guys do not understand logics, point blank.

What do you mean by that?


The point and the supporting arguments i presented were very clear.

[miron_lang]

Pacquiao did enough to win the 1st and 2nd fights like Marquez did but i just can't see how you could have Pacquiao winning this 3rd fight.

I'll tell you but you have to forget about ultimately deciding that Marquez won it.


the 5 posters ( including you ) gave rounds to Pacquio that justifiably and potentially can give Pacquiao a wide decision win. The 5 of you gave 9 potential rounds to Pacquiao.

ALL 5 of you were'nt bias. ALL 5 of you were'nt paid off. ALL 5 of you had it for Marquez but ALL 5 of you ultimately showed that 9 rounds are there that Pacquiao can claim that he had won.

[ElTerribleMorales]

That is a genious post miron_lang. You did not render an opinion but came up with a solid conclusion based on available evidence. Nobody can argue with that.

i'm pretty sure a person who can't spell the word genius would think that a pointless thread such as this one would also be in fact genius

And you didn't even think that could have been a typographical error. If you look at your keypad, the 'i' is next to the 'o'. As if you have not committed any errors in spelling.

Maybe you can tell us which rounds you think are clearly for Marquez and only a fool will score that for Pacquiao.

already put my round by round up, wont get baited into a "see Manny won" bullshit argument with a blind Pactard, funny I don't hear any of the Pacquiao fan's rambling on how Manny did a better job than Floyd seeing how that's all they've been doing as of late, posting how Manny always out does Mayweather, well Pacquiao just took on Marquez at the same weight Floyd did, two years later and he still ended up beaten up while Mayweather dominated Marquez and only didn't get the stoppage cause he didn't push for it, karma...it's priceless haha

[Andre]

Mirron Lang great post nice work mate, NO ROBBERY.

Glenn Trowbridge had Pac as unbeatable except for a KO after the tenth round !!!! with a score of 116 to 112 it was out of reach i his mind for Juan.

(That is ridiculous). That is not professional.

Think about that one in depth and this is so far removed from consistency in judging that he should be removed.

Juan deserved better than that and we all know it.


Which makes me think further..maybe this wasnt a robbery by judges but WTF is that score doing there? and wtf is he doing there? Is he there for that reason alone?

[InTheNeutralCorner]

already put my round by round up, wont get baited into a "see Manny won" bullshit argument with a blind Pactard, funny I don't hear any of the Pacquiao fan's rambling on how Manny did a better job than Floyd seeing how that's all they've been doing as of late, posting how Manny always out does Mayweather, well Pacquiao just took on Marquez at the same weight Floyd did, two years later and he still ended up beaten up while Mayweather dominated Marquez and only didn't get the stoppage cause he didn't push for it, karma...it's priceless haha

Weren't you one of those who think the fight result is a robbery? If not, then I apologize but if you are, then I have given you just a simple question.

I did not ask your round by round, I asked which rounds you think clearly belongs to Marquez and only a fool would give it to Pacquiao.

[miron_lang]

That is a genious post miron_lang. You did not render an opinion but came up with a solid conclusion based on available evidence. Nobody can argue with that.

i'm pretty sure a person who can't spell the word genius would think that a pointless thread such as this one would also be in fact genius

Genius is not the proper world.

but this thread has a point. all rounds were close that could have gone either way.

It is also true that Marquez exceeded expectations primarily because he was written off by almost everybody. except me and Cutemick