Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[Fenster]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

You score boxing matches by the round. The judges have to hand a score in at the end of every round.

In almost ALL robberies people will be in agreement on the exact rounds won. Real robberies are clear cut.

However, in this fight, the rounds were so ambiguous that FIVE random people, that scored it for Marquez, gave Pacquiao NINE different rounds between them.

Which means, even if the majority think Marquez won, it's highly probable using the WINNING Marquez scorecards to find Pac the winner. You can't argue with that.

NO robbery. Fact.