Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[FinitoElDinamita]

There was close rounds that could of went either way but to give Pacquiao a win i think a judge would have to give Pacquiao all of the close rounds.

I think Pacquiao did enough to get a draw but a win ? i don't think so.

Most rounds were competitive but Marquez got the better of them in most in them based on his cleaner harder shots and the fight was fought at a Marquez pace for the most part.

Pacquiao did enough to win the 1st and 2nd fights like Marquez did but i just can't see how you could have Pacquiao winning this 3rd fight.

You're evaluating the fight in its entirety. Judges do it round by round.

If you look at the whole content. then there's no doubt about it Marquez won. but that's not the way judges score it.

I watched the fight from rounds 1-12 and i had Marquez winning more rounds.

Every fan judges a fight round by round then evaluates there scores at the end. The fight as a whole was a win for Marquez.

The fact you have to twist and take other fight fans scores and mix them up to get a Pacquiao win is a joke.

The point is those 5 posters (including me) had Marquez winning. Not Pacquiao.

lol Pwned again.. pactards are used to getting shown up..

These guys do not understand logics, point blank.

[miron_lang]

lol Pwned again.. pactards are used to getting shown up..

These guys do not understand logics, point blank.

What do you mean by that?


The point and the supporting arguments i presented were very clear.