No, based on his premise, the first and second fights also were not "robberies" -- they were close fights. Hardly seems controversial to me.Originally Posted by Addicted to Boxing
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Not a ROBBERY Please look :D
No, based on his premise, the first and second fights also were not "robberies" -- they were close fights. Hardly seems controversial to me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks