Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[shza]

Based on your premise JMM won the 1st and 2nd fight .....

No, based on his premise, the first and second fights also were not "robberies" -- they were close fights. Hardly seems controversial to me.

[LobowolfXXX]

The notion that there have to be 7 clear rounds for Marquez to make it a robbery is simply mistaken. Your (Miron's) example in the other thread where Marquez "clearly dominated" 5 rounds, and other 7 are all even, and would lose the fight 115-113, would CLEARLY be a robbery.

Not saying that's what happened in this fight, but that notion is just flat-out wrong. If you're not ANY worse in ANY rounds, and you clearly dominate 5 out of 12 rounds, and you lose by 2, you were robbed. Bigtime.

[miron_lang]

The notion that there have to be 7 clear rounds for Marquez to make it a robbery is simply mistaken. Your (Miron's) example in the other thread where Marquez "clearly dominated" 5 rounds, and other 7 are all even, and would lose the fight 115-113, would CLEARLY be a robbery.

Not saying that's what happened in this fight, but that notion is just flat-out wrong. If you're not ANY worse in ANY rounds, and you clearly dominate 5 out of 12 rounds, and you lose by 2, you were robbed. Bigtime.

NO.

Winning 7 rounds CLEARLY is a TECHNICAL proof that a fighter won a fight. and therefore you can CRY ROBBERY.


You cant cry robbery if you have it 116-112 and have 8 ROUNDS as EXTREMELY CLOSE.

[Addicted to Boxing]

At first I did not favor a PBF vs PAC fight as pbf will destroy him. Confused on if a PAC destruction would be more pleasurable or a Jmm like result happeneng to PAC . I would say option two but that would be impossible as any close fight is going to be gift wrapped for PAC and his charming Geico caveman smile..

Based on your premise JMM won the 1st and 2nd fight .....

No, based on his premise, the first and second fights also were not "robberies" -- they were close fights. Hardly seems controversial to me.

[Addicted to Boxing]

I had PAC winning the first losing fight two and three . Robbery seems to be word that offends so I believe they misjudged fights Is more apt.

At first I did not favor a PBF vs PAC fight as pbf will destroy him. Confused on if a PAC destruction would be more pleasurable or a Jmm like result happeneng to PAC . I would say option two but that would be impossible as any close fight is going to be gift wrapped for PAC and his charming Geico caveman smile..

Based on your premise JMM won the 1st and 2nd fight .....

No, based on his premise, the first and second fights also were not "robberies" -- they were close fights. Hardly seems controversial to me.