Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[LobowolfXXX]

The notion that there have to be 7 clear rounds for Marquez to make it a robbery is simply mistaken. Your (Miron's) example in the other thread where Marquez "clearly dominated" 5 rounds, and other 7 are all even, and would lose the fight 115-113, would CLEARLY be a robbery.

Not saying that's what happened in this fight, but that notion is just flat-out wrong. If you're not ANY worse in ANY rounds, and you clearly dominate 5 out of 12 rounds, and you lose by 2, you were robbed. Bigtime.

[miron_lang]

The notion that there have to be 7 clear rounds for Marquez to make it a robbery is simply mistaken. Your (Miron's) example in the other thread where Marquez "clearly dominated" 5 rounds, and other 7 are all even, and would lose the fight 115-113, would CLEARLY be a robbery.

Not saying that's what happened in this fight, but that notion is just flat-out wrong. If you're not ANY worse in ANY rounds, and you clearly dominate 5 out of 12 rounds, and you lose by 2, you were robbed. Bigtime.

NO.

Winning 7 rounds CLEARLY is a TECHNICAL proof that a fighter won a fight. and therefore you can CRY ROBBERY.


You cant cry robbery if you have it 116-112 and have 8 ROUNDS as EXTREMELY CLOSE.