Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    1000% that shows how retarded Eubank is and always hs been, as for the rest of his bullshit, well what more is there to say, he is an idiot.
    Grow up!

    1000% only means ten times more!

    If McCallum only landed 6 punches on Watson in a round and Watson landed 66, then Watson has landed 1000% more punches.

    Percentage only means the same amount by percent of another amount. If Eubank landed 2 punches and Watson only one, then Eubank has landed 100% more than Watson. Or Watson has landed 50% of what Eubank has
    2 pea's in a pod. justify Eubanks bullshit.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    806
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    1000% that shows how retarded Eubank is and always hs been, as for the rest of his bullshit, well what more is there to say, he is an idiot.
    Grow up!

    1000% only means ten times more!

    If McCallum only landed 6 punches on Watson in a round and Watson landed 66, then Watson has landed 1000% more punches.

    Percentage only means the same amount by percent of another amount. If Eubank landed 2 punches and Watson only one, then Eubank has landed 100% more than Watson. Or Watson has landed 50% of what Eubank has
    2 pea's in a pod. justify Eubanks bullshit.
    Truth hurt?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    I just had a reputation comment from "dark lord al" saying "100% is final"

    I think what he means is you cant have more than 100%. Maybe not in effort because 100% is seen as the max but in, for instance business you can say if a hotdog costs you 50 pence to make, including the bun, weiner, onions and mustard (all your costs) and you sell it for £3 then you have made a 500% mark up.

    Eubank was on about the amount of punches landed, not the amount of effort.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    I just had a reputation comment from "dark lord al" saying "100% is final"

    I think what he means is you cant have more than 100%. Maybe not in effort because 100% is seen as the max but in, for instance business you can say if a hotdog costs you 50 pence to make, including the bun, weiner, onions and mustard (all your costs) and you sell it for £3 then you have made a 500% mark up.

    Eubank was on about the amount of punches landed, not the amount of effort.

    dark al int that great at percentages
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  5. #5
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    After all thes years Wwatt aka Berry, is still obsessed over Chris Eubank.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Eubanks is interesting to listen to but does talk nonsense at times. If Watson was beaten by Mike McCallum then how can his fight with Watson be classed as p4p best middleweight fight. McCallum would have battered Eubanks and could well have stopped him with his body shots, which was the only vulnerable part of Eubanks at that time. Chris avoided Graham, McCallum and Nunn (US fighters) so he cannot retrospectively class his fighters bigger than they really were.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Eubanks is interesting to listen to but does talk nonsense at times. If Watson was beaten by Mike McCallum then how can his fight with Watson be classed as p4p best middleweight fight. McCallum would have battered Eubanks and could well have stopped him with his body shots, which was the only vulnerable part of Eubanks at that time. Chris avoided Graham, McCallum and Nunn (US fighters) so he cannot retrospectively class his fighters bigger than they really were.
    very well put

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Eubanks is interesting to listen to but does talk nonsense at times. If Watson was beaten by Mike McCallum then how can his fight with Watson be classed as p4p best middleweight fight. McCallum would have battered Eubanks and could well have stopped him with his body shots, which was the only vulnerable part of Eubanks at that time. Chris avoided Graham, McCallum and Nunn (US fighters) so he cannot retrospectively class his fighters bigger than they really were.
    McCallum would have battered Eubank but he struggled with Watson and Collins? He got the results but didnt have an easy time gettimg there and Eubank was like Toney against Nunn. He had the ability to turn a fight inbhis favour, especially before the second Watson fight.

    As for Graham, Eubank knocked him out in sparring and what was Graham in 1990? A knockout victim in four rounds to Jackson. Even if Eubank was avoiding him, Graham gave him the perfect excuse by getting sparkod cold in 4 rounds and making himself basically a journeyman.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    806
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Eubanks is interesting to listen to but does talk nonsense at times. If Watson was beaten by Mike McCallum then how can his fight with Watson be classed as p4p best middleweight fight. McCallum would have battered Eubanks and could well have stopped him with his body shots, which was the only vulnerable part of Eubanks at that time. Chris avoided Graham, McCallum and Nunn (US fighters) so he cannot retrospectively class his fighters bigger than they really were.
    I don't think McCallum could've possibly battered Eubank - Eubank didn't give enough, he was always just out of distance. Plus Eubank was three weights bigger and stronger and 10 years younger and fresher.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    806
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Eubank hints that Eubank-Watson 1 was for P4P title!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Chris avoided Graham, McCallum and Nunn (US fighters) so he cannot retrospectively class his fighters bigger than they really were.
    He signed to fight McCallum in 1990.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 08:23 PM
  2. Just watched Eubank vs Watson 2
    By Poom in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-03-2006, 05:20 PM
  3. JUST WHO WAS THE BEST: bENN EUBANK WATSON
    By cymru_am_byth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-03-2006, 08:29 PM
  4. Eubank V Watson 2
    By ross in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-18-2006, 01:11 PM
  5. EUBANK V WATSON 1 - For DD Watched it again
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-14-2005, 04:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing