Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Anybody that thinks old george stood a chance against young tyson is on drugs
Array
When was Foremans prime?
For as big, strong and powerfull as he was he never dominated the division. He made one successfull defence in the seventies.
Array
Array
He didnt just lose to Ali though did he. Alao, im wrong, he didnt only make just one successfull defence. It was 2![]()
Array
I'm not 100% confident an old Foreman would have beaten Tyson in his prime but I would certainly have gone for him (Prime Foreman isn't even an argument for me, he destroys Tyson) . Foreman was awesome against people who came forward and Tyson didn't go backwards and if it came to a blow for blow fight Foremans chin, Heart and power all outweigh Tysons.
So it's such an inane argument you won't bother me with the details of why I'm wrong
George Foreman vs Mike Tyson
Height: 6'4 5'10
Weight: 220 (256-260 in comeback) 218 (220 post prison)
Reach: 82" 71"
Plus a couple facts here, Evander Holyfield was the undefeated undisputed heavyweight champion of the world when George Foreman fought him in 1991. When Tyson fought Holyfield, Evander was coming out of retirement due to heart trouble that he had when he lost his titles to Michael Moorer. George Foreman beat all time great 'Smokin' Joe Frazier IN HIS PRIME.....Mike Tyson lost to every single one of the "PRIME" greats he fought, he beat an old ill prepared Larry Holmes.
Another fun fact: Foreman could get off the canvas to win fights....Tyson never did. Oh also, Foreman was only ever stopped 1 time, Tyson was stopped in 100% of his losses which shows a lack of heart.
Well for one, to say tyson lacks heart is silly, most of his losses were due to lack of training, he would fall getting clocked from pure exhaustion, sure he wasn't disciplined, but guy had heart.
Also evander fought a subpar version of tyson and it was still very competitive(i also think he was juicing at the time) but speculation aside "old" george was way to hittable, he was practically as easy to hit as a punching bag against evander and morrison, and these guys packed no where near the kind of power tyson had, and Tyson had a great chin despite being stopped, like mentioned was always from pure exhaustion.
George was also really slow at the time, and please dont compare tyson to frazier, two totally different beasts, now i am sure young george would give tyson hell, i still say he loses prime vs prime, but no way old george takes even a half way decent tyson(he wasn't halfway decent for douglas), i am sure i missed a lot, but remember Tysons problem was motivation, when he was motivated he was unstoppable,i honestly think he would come prepared for a george foreman
Array
George still wanted no part I take it?
Maybe he didnt want to try and deal with Mikes speed. I dont doubt he could take a clean shot off Mike without going down but I do doubt that he could make a competative fight and he was probably thinking that himself. He wasnt quick in his youth, let alone his 40's. He took a ton of shots from Holyfield who wasnt as quick or powerfull as Mike.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks