Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: The vid that explains it all

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bartlett, Illinois
    Posts
    845
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1229
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The vid that explains it all

    Deductions on an extremely close match is tantamount to DQ'ing the penalized party and more than likely assured its beneficiary of a win, in a tightly contested fight,

    Logic dictates. Even the slightly off the wall with any competence in reasoning can surely agree to this.

    In a basketball analogy... A minute left in a ball game all tied at 104, suddenly the referee calls a technical on a very "weak" infraction. Two points! 104-106. Before long, another violation is called by this ref in the last possession for the now trailing team. Another two points on free throws... score now, 108-104, at this junture, practically it is game over! The "better team" did nothing to decide the outcome of the game, the man with the whistle made sure of that. The victor is the team whom he chose!

    Boy! The referee sure showed them, "who's the boss", eh! Maybe he got tired of issuing those incessant warnings during the game! Instant justice! Maybe he's that NBA ref who went to jail for bets on the games.

    This is not to state that Lamont Peterson needed this gift from the ref, all's been docked is... granted that the scores are very even, the deductions purposefully represented a guarantee of victory for him. Not that Lamont needed it. He could have very well earned the win without them, but somehow the ref's less than stellar outing robbed Peterson of a "clean" win!
    Last edited by KananKrus; 12-14-2011 at 10:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,900
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    902
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The vid that explains it all

    Quote Originally Posted by KananKrus View Post
    Deductions on an extremely close match is tantamount to DQ'ing the penalized party and more than likely assured its beneficiary of a win, in a tightly contested fight,

    Logic dictates. Even the slightly off the wall with any competence in reasoning can surely agree to this.

    In a basketball analogy... A minute left in a ball game all tied at 104, suddenly the referee calls a technical on a very "weak" infraction. Two points! 104-106. Before long, another violation is called by this ref in the last possession for the now trailing team. Another two points on free throws... score now, 108-104, at this junture, practically it is game over! The "better team" did nothing to decide the outcome of the game, the man with the whistle made sure of that. The victor is the team whom he chose!

    Boy! The referee sure showed them, "who's the boss", eh! Maybe he got tired of issuing those incessant warnings during the game! Instant justice! Maybe he's that NBA ref who went to jail for bets on the games.

    This is not to state that Lamont Peterson needed this gift from the ref, all's been docked is... granted that the scores are very even, the deductions purposefully represented a guarantee of victory for him. Not that Lamont needed it. He could have very well earned the win without them, but somehow the ref's less than stellar outing robbed Peterson of a "clean" win!
    you're taking liberties with the facts by comparing the 7th round of a 12 round fight to the final minute of a basketball game.

    but... if the ref had been telling one team to stop doing something illegal over and over again over the course of the game; and that team was gaining advantage by repeatedly doing it; i think it the judge would be acting within reason if he were to penalise the team that has consistently broken the rules.

    your point that the ref suddenly penalised khan is ridiculous because the ref had warned him 7 times before deducting the point the second to last time he said "Last time... Stop pushin'." at 1:17 of the 7th round.

    what kind of win would khan have had if the ref had simply warned him a few dozen times and not penalised him for any infractions?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The vid that explains it all

    You have to face fact's, both fighter's were fighting, dirty Peterson got away with it
    Khan did not.? The ref was not up to much,? but he did warn him I could see it coming
    but could Khan's corner.?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4168
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The vid that explains it all

    Highlights two things to me . One the Ref wasnt physically doing his job by touching both or physically ripping them apart, telling one stop leaning its not a wrestling match, then the other to stop pushing.

    Also highlights that Kahn could of used footwork and made the other guy pay without expending so much energy pushing dead weight back all the time. Shows hes got allot more to learn about control too.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Mayweather Jr Explains Why He Parties
    By Otley in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-31-2011, 06:59 AM
  2. David Haye explains why the Klit fight hasn't gone ahead
    By boxingbantz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-02-2010, 12:40 PM
  3. Replies: 208
    Last Post: 02-16-2008, 12:21 AM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-16-2008, 08:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing