Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch

[shza]

Amazing how much you can go on about judges and objectivity without so much as acknowledging that one of the three judges scored the fight for Hopkins.

youre such a mong

You started with the objectivity bollox - "froch fans are all biast and just can be objective and ward would have beaten all froches opponents easily in their own back yards one after another"

One of the judges scored the fight to hopkins - feel better?

Calzaghe deservedly won the fight

I'm not sure what you're referring to, since I never said that. In a completely different thread. Your post on this thread was the one that introduced "objectivity" here and the notion that a win on the cards proves something about Calzaghe deserving to win. (Despite directly contradicting yourself on that same point w/r/t Hatton-Collazo.)

It is, of course, true that Ward would have beaten all of Froch's opponents (the ones he didn't already beat) though, btw.

[erics44]

Point out the post where i mention objectivity

And explain my contradiction

[shza]

Point out the post where i mention objectivity

And explain my contradiction

If you're too lazy to look four or five posts up and too much of an idiot or pretender to not acknowledge or understand your contradiction, there's no helping you. But that's been obvious since you started posting on this site.

[erics44]

Point out the post where i mention objectivity

And explain my contradiction

If you're too lazy to look four or five posts up and too much of an idiot or pretender to not acknowledge or understand your contradiction, there's no helping you. But that's been obvious since you started posting on this site.

youre last ditch attempt to outwit me is to talk utter bollox

I like it, its desperate but a reasonable attempt