Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Cleverly fighting some random ranked 83rd in the world. WHY?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    782
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    @ rantacrat
    We both know the answer to that.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    959
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cleverly fighting some random ranked 83rd in the world. WHY?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    I will slate him until he loses and then say I told you so!
    Gotta love froch for doing the opposite
    See your a Froch fan, what's not to like let's see is he undefeated, is he the best in the division
    will he get beat in his next fight probable.
    Never mind may be you could match him on Fight Night, may I suggest a opponent let's see
    Froch v Caldoron he may win that one.
    Let's compare records
    The truth will always prevail in the end and froch has fought the best and the youngest at their primes, undefeated means nothing, Calzaghe would have losses on his record if he actually took on the best when it mattered, and cleverly just keeps fighting bums, I would lick his arse of he had the froch heart and go to America for a unification bout.
    What matters is who you fight and a real champ fights the best and defends on foreign soil
    Stick to Fight Night.
    I'll stick to the truth and glad to help you out.
    YES
    I said louder
    Ok, Carl Froch


    Established himself as a top class opponent, hasn't established himself as a champion. He's a level below Kessler, Ward, and Bute.

    When he loses to Bute, he wont exactly be remembered as a talent, he will be remembered as a good-fighter. But lets be honest, most of Britain doesn't know who he is, his bubble has been burst since the Kessler fight.

    He was handled wrong with Hennesy in my opinion, to late when sky got him. He's to one dimensional to be a great fighter.

    I see Froch has not stuck to his word *I will give an up and coming fighter, his due, by fighting me*.

    Boxing is a business and its about the money, Froch is still good enough to earn a couple of million or whatever he earns per-fight. There's no excuses why Froch shouldn't fight Cleverly.

    Froch has contradicted himself and being a hypocrite in my opinion.

    Slander Calzaghe for the position he was in. Hopkins - Jones in America, or Carl who ? In Britain.

    Froch is in a very similar position to Calzaghe as he was back in 07 was it ? Anyway, the fact is MONEY. Why fight Cleverly, for peanuts, or Bute for millions. Calzaghe why fight Froch for peanuts, or Hopkins for millions. Calzaghe was in a much higher position than Froch, undefeated record, came off great wins and unified the division.

    The reality is Froch thought he was going to win the super six, and he got schooled badly by Ward. Bute will now defeat him, which leaves him cannon-fodder for the young pretenders.

    Call Calzaghe all you want, but Froch is not the I WILL FIGHT ANY-MAN ALIVE. He's a moneyman, just like every other fighter to put gloves on.


    Cleverly deserves this fight, Froch step up be a man of your word.
    Why jump to 175 if you can still make weight at 168? Bute is a better opponent than Cleverly in every single respect. If you weren't biased, who would you give Froch more credit for beating Bute or Cleverly?
    It's not about being biased,Froch is entertaining but we all have to face fact's he is a limited fighter,
    When or if he fight's Bute it for the money not the belt or glory just £££ don't kid yourself boxing is
    a business,good luck to Froch he may be full of shit. Did Calzaghe go up to 175 yes and beat 2 opponent's.Cleverly is a good fighter and has a good pedigree Remember it all about the money.!

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,342
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3109
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cleverly fighting some random ranked 83rd in the world. WHY?

    I think people should get off Cheverly’s back, he is a young, talented but inexperienced fighter. He needs time to develop and gain experience. Forget the nonsense that Warren has spouted about fighting Hopkins that is just hype. The fight with Froch can also wait.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    959
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cleverly fighting some random ranked 83rd in the world. WHY?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I think people should get off Cheverly’s back, he is a young, talented but inexperienced fighter. He needs time to develop and gain experience. Forget the nonsense that Warren has spouted about fighting Hopkins that is just hype. The fight with Froch can also wait.
    At last

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    381
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    730
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cleverly fighting some random ranked 83rd in the world. WHY?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    I will slate him until he loses and then say I told you so!
    Gotta love froch for doing the opposite
    See your a Froch fan, what's not to like let's see is he undefeated, is he the best in the division
    will he get beat in his next fight probable.
    Never mind may be you could match him on Fight Night, may I suggest a opponent let's see
    Froch v Caldoron he may win that one.
    Let's compare records
    The truth will always prevail in the end and froch has fought the best and the youngest at their primes, undefeated means nothing, Calzaghe would have losses on his record if he actually took on the best when it mattered, and cleverly just keeps fighting bums, I would lick his arse of he had the froch heart and go to America for a unification bout.
    What matters is who you fight and a real champ fights the best and defends on foreign soil
    Stick to Fight Night.
    I'll stick to the truth and glad to help you out.
    YES
    I said louder
    Ok, Carl Froch


    Established himself as a top class opponent, hasn't established himself as a champion. He's a level below Kessler, Ward, and Bute.

    When he loses to Bute, he wont exactly be remembered as a talent, he will be remembered as a good-fighter. But lets be honest, most of Britain doesn't know who he is, his bubble has been burst since the Kessler fight.

    He was handled wrong with Hennesy in my opinion, to late when sky got him. He's to one dimensional to be a great fighter.

    I see Froch has not stuck to his word *I will give an up and coming fighter, his due, by fighting me*.

    Boxing is a business and its about the money, Froch is still good enough to earn a couple of million or whatever he earns per-fight. There's no excuses why Froch shouldn't fight Cleverly.

    Froch has contradicted himself and being a hypocrite in my opinion.

    Slander Calzaghe for the position he was in. Hopkins - Jones in America, or Carl who ? In Britain.

    Froch is in a very similar position to Calzaghe as he was back in 07 was it ? Anyway, the fact is MONEY. Why fight Cleverly, for peanuts, or Bute for millions. Calzaghe why fight Froch for peanuts, or Hopkins for millions. Calzaghe was in a much higher position than Froch, undefeated record, came off great wins and unified the division.

    The reality is Froch thought he was going to win the super six, and he got schooled badly by Ward. Bute will now defeat him, which leaves him cannon-fodder for the young pretenders.

    Call Calzaghe all you want, but Froch is not the I WILL FIGHT ANY-MAN ALIVE. He's a moneyman, just like every other fighter to put gloves on.


    Cleverly deserves this fight, Froch step up be a man of your word.
    Why jump to 175 if you can still make weight at 168? Bute is a better opponent than Cleverly in every single respect. If you weren't biased, who would you give Froch more credit for beating Bute or Cleverly?
    It's not about being biased,Froch is entertaining but we all have to face fact's he is a limited fighter,
    When or if he fight's Bute it for the money not the belt or glory just £££ don't kid yourself boxing is
    a business,good luck to Froch he may be full of shit. Did Calzaghe go up to 175 yes and beat 2 opponent's.Cleverly is a good fighter and has a good pedigree Remember it all about the money.!
    If anyone in the world of boxing fights to take on the best its Froch. He may be delusional but he wants to fight the best and be the best. I think at the end of the Ward fight he realised that he was outmatched. He is fighting Bute now and I garentee you he thinks he can win. I give him a chance. I still have my money on Bute but not counting Froch out.
    As far as Cleverly goes. He has had 23 fights and needs to step up. Compare him to murray. He prided himself on being the british fighter with most undefeated fights. But that means nothing when your fighting a bunch of losers.
    Now compare him to Khan. 3 more fights than Cleverly and has faced the best opposition in his devision.
    Now if he fights Froch then all power to him for stepping up. But im not going to blame Froch for taking the harder and more important fight in Bute. I would be more irritated if he took the easier fight in Cleverly.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1316
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cleverly fighting some random ranked 83rd in the world. WHY?

    Quote Originally Posted by Leighton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    I will slate him until he loses and then say I told you so!
    Gotta love froch for doing the opposite
    See your a Froch fan, what's not to like let's see is he undefeated, is he the best in the division
    will he get beat in his next fight probable.
    Never mind may be you could match him on Fight Night, may I suggest a opponent let's see
    Froch v Caldoron he may win that one.
    Let's compare records
    The truth will always prevail in the end and froch has fought the best and the youngest at their primes, undefeated means nothing, Calzaghe would have losses on his record if he actually took on the best when it mattered, and cleverly just keeps fighting bums, I would lick his arse of he had the froch heart and go to America for a unification bout.
    What matters is who you fight and a real champ fights the best and defends on foreign soil
    Stick to Fight Night.
    I'll stick to the truth and glad to help you out.
    YES
    I said louder
    Ok, Carl Froch


    Established himself as a top class opponent, hasn't established himself as a champion. He's a level below Kessler, Ward, and Bute.

    When he loses to Bute, he wont exactly be remembered as a talent, he will be remembered as a good-fighter. But lets be honest, most of Britain doesn't know who he is, his bubble has been burst since the Kessler fight.

    He was handled wrong with Hennesy in my opinion, to late when sky got him. He's to one dimensional to be a great fighter.

    I see Froch has not stuck to his word *I will give an up and coming fighter, his due, by fighting me*.

    Boxing is a business and its about the money, Froch is still good enough to earn a couple of million or whatever he earns per-fight. There's no excuses why Froch shouldn't fight Cleverly.

    Froch has contradicted himself and being a hypocrite in my opinion.

    Slander Calzaghe for the position he was in. Hopkins - Jones in America, or Carl who ? In Britain.

    Froch is in a very similar position to Calzaghe as he was back in 07 was it ? Anyway, the fact is MONEY. Why fight Cleverly, for peanuts, or Bute for millions. Calzaghe why fight Froch for peanuts, or Hopkins for millions. Calzaghe was in a much higher position than Froch, undefeated record, came off great wins and unified the division.

    The reality is Froch thought he was going to win the super six, and he got schooled badly by Ward. Bute will now defeat him, which leaves him cannon-fodder for the young pretenders.

    Call Calzaghe all you want, but Froch is not the I WILL FIGHT ANY-MAN ALIVE. He's a moneyman, just like every other fighter to put gloves on.


    Cleverly deserves this fight, Froch step up be a man of your word.
    Why jump to 175 if you can still make weight at 168? Bute is a better opponent than Cleverly in every single respect. If you weren't biased, who would you give Froch more credit for beating Bute or Cleverly?
    It's not about being biased,Froch is entertaining but we all have to face fact's he is a limited fighter,
    When or if he fight's Bute it for the money not the belt or glory just £££ don't kid yourself boxing is
    a business,good luck to Froch he may be full of shit. Did Calzaghe go up to 175 yes and beat 2 opponent's.Cleverly is a good fighter and has a good pedigree Remember it all about the money.!
    If anyone in the world of boxing fights to take on the best its Froch. He may be delusional but he wants to fight the best and be the best. I think at the end of the Ward fight he realised that he was outmatched. He is fighting Bute now and I garentee you he thinks he can win. I give him a chance. I still have my money on Bute but not counting Froch out.
    As far as Cleverly goes. He has had 23 fights and needs to step up. Compare him to murray. He prided himself on being the british fighter with most undefeated fights. But that means nothing when your fighting a bunch of losers.
    Now compare him to Khan. 3 more fights than Cleverly and has faced the best opposition in his devision.
    Now if he fights Froch then all power to him for stepping up. But im not going to blame Froch for taking the harder and more important fight in Bute. I would be more irritated if he took the easier fight in Cleverly.
    Good point, Leighten. Who's the tougher fight? Who would you give Froch more credit for facing?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    381
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    730
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cleverly fighting some random ranked 83rd in the world. WHY?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Leighton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    I will slate him until he loses and then say I told you so!
    Gotta love froch for doing the opposite
    See your a Froch fan, what's not to like let's see is he undefeated, is he the best in the division
    will he get beat in his next fight probable.
    Never mind may be you could match him on Fight Night, may I suggest a opponent let's see
    Froch v Caldoron he may win that one.
    Let's compare records
    The truth will always prevail in the end and froch has fought the best and the youngest at their primes, undefeated means nothing, Calzaghe would have losses on his record if he actually took on the best when it mattered, and cleverly just keeps fighting bums, I would lick his arse of he had the froch heart and go to America for a unification bout.
    What matters is who you fight and a real champ fights the best and defends on foreign soil
    Stick to Fight Night.
    I'll stick to the truth and glad to help you out.
    YES
    I said louder
    Ok, Carl Froch


    Established himself as a top class opponent, hasn't established himself as a champion. He's a level below Kessler, Ward, and Bute.

    When he loses to Bute, he wont exactly be remembered as a talent, he will be remembered as a good-fighter. But lets be honest, most of Britain doesn't know who he is, his bubble has been burst since the Kessler fight.

    He was handled wrong with Hennesy in my opinion, to late when sky got him. He's to one dimensional to be a great fighter.

    I see Froch has not stuck to his word *I will give an up and coming fighter, his due, by fighting me*.

    Boxing is a business and its about the money, Froch is still good enough to earn a couple of million or whatever he earns per-fight. There's no excuses why Froch shouldn't fight Cleverly.

    Froch has contradicted himself and being a hypocrite in my opinion.

    Slander Calzaghe for the position he was in. Hopkins - Jones in America, or Carl who ? In Britain.

    Froch is in a very similar position to Calzaghe as he was back in 07 was it ? Anyway, the fact is MONEY. Why fight Cleverly, for peanuts, or Bute for millions. Calzaghe why fight Froch for peanuts, or Hopkins for millions. Calzaghe was in a much higher position than Froch, undefeated record, came off great wins and unified the division.

    The reality is Froch thought he was going to win the super six, and he got schooled badly by Ward. Bute will now defeat him, which leaves him cannon-fodder for the young pretenders.

    Call Calzaghe all you want, but Froch is not the I WILL FIGHT ANY-MAN ALIVE. He's a moneyman, just like every other fighter to put gloves on.


    Cleverly deserves this fight, Froch step up be a man of your word.
    Why jump to 175 if you can still make weight at 168? Bute is a better opponent than Cleverly in every single respect. If you weren't biased, who would you give Froch more credit for beating Bute or Cleverly?
    It's not about being biased,Froch is entertaining but we all have to face fact's he is a limited fighter,
    When or if he fight's Bute it for the money not the belt or glory just £££ don't kid yourself boxing is
    a business,good luck to Froch he may be full of shit. Did Calzaghe go up to 175 yes and beat 2 opponent's.Cleverly is a good fighter and has a good pedigree Remember it all about the money.!
    If anyone in the world of boxing fights to take on the best its Froch. He may be delusional but he wants to fight the best and be the best. I think at the end of the Ward fight he realised that he was outmatched. He is fighting Bute now and I garentee you he thinks he can win. I give him a chance. I still have my money on Bute but not counting Froch out.
    As far as Cleverly goes. He has had 23 fights and needs to step up. Compare him to murray. He prided himself on being the british fighter with most undefeated fights. But that means nothing when your fighting a bunch of losers.
    Now compare him to Khan. 3 more fights than Cleverly and has faced the best opposition in his devision.
    Now if he fights Froch then all power to him for stepping up. But im not going to blame Froch for taking the harder and more important fight in Bute. I would be more irritated if he took the easier fight in Cleverly.
    Good point, Leighten. Who's the tougher fight? Who would you give Froch more credit for facing?
    Do you mean out of Cleverly and Bute. Or anyone in the devision. If its the first I would say Bute. Even though he has not fought the quality of opposition Froch has. However you dont know how good Cleverly really is until he fights good opposition. I dont blame him entirely as Braehmer pulled out of the title fight. That would have been a good name for him, and a good challenge.
    In the devision I would give Froch credit for challenging Ward again. Im not saying I want to see the fight as he will lose badly, but if he still wants to fight him after the beating he got then all power to him.
    As far as a fight I would like to see Froch take, that would be a Kessler rematch. In my opinion the most entertaining fight of the super six.
    Thats what I think, even though looking back at my posts im being a bit too opinionated.
    Who would you like to see Froch fight. Further more who would you want to see Cleverly fight in his devision. I know the top four players in the devision but the others in the top ten I have not seen them fight.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Cleverly v some random bum!
    By rosco1984 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-17-2011, 08:03 PM
  2. Haye now ranked #2 contender in the world
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 04-08-2010, 02:03 PM
  3. World Ranked British fighters...
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-22-2010, 08:33 PM
  4. Bute Now Ranked #1 in the World
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 06:58 PM
  5. Haye Ranked World number one Cruiserweight.......
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-13-2006, 06:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing