Quote Originally Posted by Leighton View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
no one is painting Bradley to be an ATG, but he is just what he's advertised as a very good overall fighter who although he doesn't do anything extraordinary he does do everything well, he's hands down the #1 guy at 140 with wins over Witter, Holt, PETERSON, and Alexander it's pretty hard to dispute that, those wins shit all over Khan's wins over Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, and Judah, and his loss to PETERSON
Witter and alexander are not good examples. Witter lost to Alexander who pretty much lost to Kotelnik who khan beat. Holt lost to Mabuza who is nothing special.
The only one you can hold over his head is Peterson. But that was such a close fight with Peterson winning with DQ points, you can not call that an easy victory.
Saying that I would still class Bradley at the top of the devision as he is undefeated and has won the majority of his fights easily. I think people only question his legitimacy because he avoided Khan.
Think he is the best fight after Mayweather. Him or Martinez anyway.
you're thinking of the wrong Peterson, Anthony Peterson was the one who was winning the fight and then got himself DQ'd against Rios, Lamont Peterson got his ass handed to him for nearly every round against Bradley, it was a shutout, and if you wanna play the game of disregarding Bradley's wins over Holt and Alexander well, Bradley pretty much dominated his opponents while Khan escaped by the skin of his teeth against Maidana and Peterson, beat Judah who just had been given a gift against Mattyhsse, and against Malignaggi who's biggest win was a rematch against a lightweight, overall Bradley's opponents hold more weight than Khan's