Re: What's next for Cotto

Originally Posted by
Althugz

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
TitoFan

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
TitoFan

Originally Posted by
Fenster
Cotto abandoned his fight plan against Pac because he got the fuck beat out of him by a superior fighter. Simple as.
Cotto is a great fighter that put up a great performance against Floyd.
You can give him huge credit without making silly excuses for his previous defeats. Lets keep it real.
This makes no sense. I'd say that he "got the fuck beat out of him" BECAUSE he abandoned his fight plan, not the other way around. And since when can't we speculate on how fighter "X" would've done in a fight under other circumstances? Oh yeah, right..... 'cause it's Cotto, the fighter you love to hate.

Cotto fought a level fight for two rounds, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 3rd, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 4th, then fought the rest of the fight completely on the defensive trying to
survive, before finally being saved from the torture.
Pac beat the shit out of Cotto. Floyd boxed the shit out of Cotto. He did well in both fights.
No excuses needed. Fact.
No excuses given. It's ok to speculate how Cotto would've done against Pacquiao with a trainer like Pedro Diaz in his corner and a gameplan like he had last night for Floyd. And from my point of view, last night was hardly "Floyd boxed the shit out of Cotto."
But you're completely biased, and never accept defeat.
Fact.
That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. How can I be "defeated" if I'm not even competing? I've simply stated how events played out.
Pac beat the shit out of Cotto. Fact.
Floyd beat a UD into Cotto. Fact.
You are 100% entitled to speculate on what might have happened. I'm just stating what
factually happened. Nothing more, nothing less.
If you were "factually" stating what happened, you would have said that Pacquiao beat the shit out of Cotto at a catchweight of 145lbs and with no trainer" - As it stands, you're being selective in your so-called facts.
Here's a "fact" for you though because I know you like facts : Pacquiao refused to fight Cotto in a rematch unless it was at 145..why is this if he so handily beat the shit out of Miguel in their first fight? (Not to mention that he is the fucking WELTERWEIGHT champion of the world NOT the 145lb champion)
To follow on from that, I would love a Pac vs Cotto rematch. I fancy Cotto to take him to the cleaners at 154. Why not? Doesn't Pacquiao formerly hold at belt at Light Middle? Or was that the 150lb belt he vacantly (and fraudalently won) against Marg?
Unfortunately team Pac will continue to sell snake oil to the Pac fans all over the world. I wish Pac would fire about 85% of his retarded team and develop a brain to think for himself. Bob Arum would be first to go and Roach wouldn't be calling any shots for Pac either.
How is stating a fact being "selective?"
If you want to add to my fact that's entirely up to you.
Cotto agreed to the catchweight. If fighting at 145 was such a major handicap he should have refused. He didn't. It's impossible to prove he lost because of the weight. That is purely opinion.
What we do know for certain though is - Pac beat the shit out of him. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks