Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: For us Pactards

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1182
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    You guys are right there are a lot of factors to consider and is just a matter of whether or not we're going to see it come to fruition. I never mentioned saying PAC is definitely going to win but the CONSISTENCY on how PAC deals more damage than the bigger Mayweather has been very obvious, not just in the Cotto Fight.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    You guys are right there are a lot of factors to consider and is just a matter of whether or not we're going to see it come to fruition. I never mentioned saying PAC is definitely going to win but the CONSISTENCY on how PAC deals more damage than the bigger Mayweather has been very obvious, not just in the Cotto Fight.
    but even that is debatable because Floyd hasn't taken on his opponents in situations where he has everything in his favor (weight, ring size, and glove size), also I think it's fair to say that Floyd was closer to stopping JMM than Manny ever has been, he took his foot off the gas and that's why Marquez went 12, same can be said about Mosley

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1182
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    You guys are right there are a lot of factors to consider and is just a matter of whether or not we're going to see it come to fruition. I never mentioned saying PAC is definitely going to win but the CONSISTENCY on how PAC deals more damage than the bigger Mayweather has been very obvious, not just in the Cotto Fight.
    but even that is debatable because Floyd hasn't taken on his opponents in situations where he has everything in his favor (weight, ring size, and glove size), also I think it's fair to say that Floyd was closer to stopping JMM than Manny ever has been, he took his foot off the gas and that's why Marquez went 12, same can be said about Mosley
    bro we don't know what's going through Floyd's mind, but one thing is for sure the guy has a big ego to let his opponents off the hook. The irony here even though it's out of context is Floyd is naturally bigger than PAC so he should be the one destroying those common opponents.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    You guys are right there are a lot of factors to consider and is just a matter of whether or not we're going to see it come to fruition. I never mentioned saying PAC is definitely going to win but the CONSISTENCY on how PAC deals more damage than the bigger Mayweather has been very obvious, not just in the Cotto Fight.
    but even that is debatable because Floyd hasn't taken on his opponents in situations where he has everything in his favor (weight, ring size, and glove size), also I think it's fair to say that Floyd was closer to stopping JMM than Manny ever has been, he took his foot off the gas and that's why Marquez went 12, same can be said about Mosley
    bro we don't know what's going through Floyd's mind, but one thing is for sure the guy has a big ego to let his opponents off the hook. The irony here even though it's out of context is Floyd is naturally bigger than PAC so he should be the one destroying those common opponents.
    but then again Floyd is just like Roy Jones, they're satisfied with the W as long as it preserves their 0, neither have ever been known to take high risks, they'll be just as happy with the TKO as they are in scoring a lopsided UD

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1020
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Floyd lays on the ropes on purpose? So did Roy when he began his slide. Now we see what has happened to superman. Why didn't Floyd stay in the middle and dominate cotto. I said the same thing about Roy vs tarver. Was Floyd trying to prove he was Ali by doing his version of rope a dope and getting a bloody nose?

    I said it before that I think Floyd is on the slide. Will he lay on the ropes and let a very fast and powerful paq throw bombs? Does Floyd still have the same amount of stamina?

    I know one thing, we will see how good paq is when he faces his first slick boxer June 9th. If he hurts or koes Bradley then I guarantee we will never see him fight Floyd.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,326
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3108
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    The whole thread comparing how they have fought fighters they have in common can be abused to suit either Pac Man or Floyd. I believe Floyd is firm favourite to win the fight at welterweight and as such Bob Arum will not allow the fight to happen in the near future.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Quote Originally Posted by chris6878 View Post
    Floyd lays on the ropes on purpose? So did Roy when he began his slide. Now we see what has happened to superman. Why didn't Floyd stay in the middle and dominate cotto. I said the same thing about Roy vs tarver. Was Floyd trying to prove he was Ali by doing his version of rope a dope and getting a bloody nose?

    I said it before that I think Floyd is on the slide. Will he lay on the ropes and let a very fast and powerful paq throw bombs? Does Floyd still have the same amount of stamina?

    I know one thing, we will see how good paq is when he faces his first slick boxer June 9th. If he hurts or koes Bradley then I guarantee we will never see him fight Floyd.
    since when is Bradley a slick boxer? the guy is like a tiny Hopkins, only he overwhelms his opponents with volume of punches, he just doesn't have pop, Bradley is the opposite of slick and sorry IMO tailor made for Pacquiao, Floyd will dominate and counter Manny IMO quite effortlessly, and honestly IMO Cotto would have troubled Pacquiao even more than he did Floyd at 154

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1020
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by chris6878 View Post
    Floyd lays on the ropes on purpose? So did Roy when he began his slide. Now we see what has happened to superman. Why didn't Floyd stay in the middle and dominate cotto. I said the same thing about Roy vs tarver. Was Floyd trying to prove he was Ali by doing his version of rope a dope and getting a bloody nose?

    I said it before that I think Floyd is on the slide. Will he lay on the ropes and let a very fast and powerful paq throw bombs? Does Floyd still have the same amount of stamina?

    I know one thing, we will see how good paq is when he faces his first slick boxer June 9th. If he hurts or koes Bradley then I guarantee we will never see him fight Floyd.
    since when is Bradley a slick boxer? the guy is like a tiny Hopkins, only he overwhelms his opponents with volume of punches, he just doesn't have pop, Bradley is the opposite of slick and sorry IMO tailor made for Pacquiao, Floyd will dominate and counter Manny IMO quite effortlessly, and honestly IMO Cotto would have troubled Pacquiao even more than he did Floyd at 154
    PAC at 154 is like Floyd at light heavy. Of course cotto would trouble PAC at that weight. I agree Bradley ain't the slickest but he is probably the first boxer with some decent movement that he has faced. I think PAC will win and it will be very exciting to watch.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2083
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    You guys are right there are a lot of factors to consider and is just a matter of whether or not we're going to see it come to fruition. I never mentioned saying PAC is definitely going to win but the CONSISTENCY on how PAC deals more damage than the bigger Mayweather has been very obvious, not just in the Cotto Fight.
    Why split hairs over it. You're missing the point... They have different styles so they obviously win in different ways.

    You can't simplify a complex sport and fans who understand boxing don't.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1182
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: For us Pactards

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    You guys are right there are a lot of factors to consider and is just a matter of whether or not we're going to see it come to fruition. I never mentioned saying PAC is definitely going to win but the CONSISTENCY on how PAC deals more damage than the bigger Mayweather has been very obvious, not just in the Cotto Fight.
    Why split hairs over it. You're missing the point... They have different styles so they obviously win in different ways.

    You can't simplify a complex sport and fans who understand boxing don't.
    fair enough
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing