Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: What's next for Cotto

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,784
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2029
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What's next for Cotto

    [QUOTE=Fenster;1071029][QUOTE=Althugz;1070782][QUOTE=Fenster;1070730]
    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Cotto abandoned his fight plan against Pac because he got the fuck beat out of him by a superior fighter. Simple as.

    Cotto is a great fighter that put up a great performance against Floyd.

    You can give him huge credit without making silly excuses for his previous defeats. Lets keep it real.

    This makes no sense. I'd say that he "got the fuck beat out of him" BECAUSE he abandoned his fight plan, not the other way around. And since when can't we speculate on how fighter "X" would've done in a fight under other circumstances? Oh yeah, right..... 'cause it's Cotto, the fighter you love to hate.

    Cotto fought a level fight for two rounds, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 3rd, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 4th, then fought the rest of the fight completely on the defensive trying to survive, before finally being saved from the torture.

    Pac beat the shit out of Cotto. Floyd boxed the shit out of Cotto. He did well in both fights.

    No excuses needed. Fact.
    How is stating a fact being "selective?"

    If you want to add to my fact that's entirely up to you.

    Cotto agreed to the catchweight. If fighting at 145 was such a major handicap he should have refused. He didn't. It's impossible to prove he lost because of the weight. That is purely opinion.

    What we do know for certain though is - Pac beat the shit out of him. Fact.
    I already gave you an example of how you were being selective so I'm not going to repeat myself. You stated "a" fact but chose to omit others. Hence you were selective (Hopefully you now understand the word "selective"..you're welcome)

    More facts :- Team Pac have been known to say things like "We knew he'd be weaker at xxx lbs"

    Or when Mosley wanted to fight Pac before Floyd signed to fight him "We'll only fight you at 142..you're not the same as Oscar"

    I like this "Fact" game...do you have any facts for me about why they wanted Miguel again at 145 despite beating the crap out of him last time for the 147 title?


    If we have no proof that the weight was the deciding factor, then neither do Team Pac. So it would have made sense, especially now, to rematch Miguel at a comfortable weight and outshine Floyd..also pick up a nice payday and some high ppv numbers.

    I have a feeling they know what's up..
    Your interpretation of the word "selective" is a bit odd.

    A fact is a fact. Whatever the weight was it will never change the fact Cotto was stopped by Pac. And that is the only fact I am reporting.

    I honestly have no idea whether Cotto got the shit beat out of him because of the weight. That's impossible to prove. Even if Cotto beat Pac at 154 it still wouldn't prove it. There are a multitude of excuses available to fighters for every contest.

    I'm not interested in excuses.


    No Fenster.... of course you're not interested in excuses. Not unless they serve YOUR agenda, of course.






    "Congratulations David Haye. Magnificent effort. Fact."
    The "experts" predicted an easy KO for Wlad. He would take Haye "whenever he felt like it"

    Instead we saw SIZE determine the outcome.

    A good big man beats a good little man.

    Well done Wlad.




    Of course, you already had no credibility to begin with.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3126
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What's next for Cotto

    [QUOTE=TitoFan;1071035][QUOTE=Fenster;1071029][QUOTE=Althugz;1070782]
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Cotto abandoned his fight plan against Pac because he got the fuck beat out of him by a superior fighter. Simple as.

    Cotto is a great fighter that put up a great performance against Floyd.

    You can give him huge credit without making silly excuses for his previous defeats. Lets keep it real.

    This makes no sense. I'd say that he "got the fuck beat out of him" BECAUSE he abandoned his fight plan, not the other way around. And since when can't we speculate on how fighter "X" would've done in a fight under other circumstances? Oh yeah, right..... 'cause it's Cotto, the fighter you love to hate.

    Cotto fought a level fight for two rounds, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 3rd, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 4th, then fought the rest of the fight completely on the defensive trying to survive, before finally being saved from the torture.

    Pac beat the shit out of Cotto. Floyd boxed the shit out of Cotto. He did well in both fights.

    No excuses needed. Fact.
    How is stating a fact being "selective?"

    If you want to add to my fact that's entirely up to you.

    Cotto agreed to the catchweight. If fighting at 145 was such a major handicap he should have refused. He didn't. It's impossible to prove he lost because of the weight. That is purely opinion.

    What we do know for certain though is - Pac beat the shit out of him. Fact.
    I already gave you an example of how you were being selective so I'm not going to repeat myself. You stated "a" fact but chose to omit others. Hence you were selective (Hopefully you now understand the word "selective"..you're welcome)

    More facts :- Team Pac have been known to say things like "We knew he'd be weaker at xxx lbs"

    Or when Mosley wanted to fight Pac before Floyd signed to fight him "We'll only fight you at 142..you're not the same as Oscar"

    I like this "Fact" game...do you have any facts for me about why they wanted Miguel again at 145 despite beating the crap out of him last time for the 147 title?


    If we have no proof that the weight was the deciding factor, then neither do Team Pac. So it would have made sense, especially now, to rematch Miguel at a comfortable weight and outshine Floyd..also pick up a nice payday and some high ppv numbers.

    I have a feeling they know what's up..
    Your interpretation of the word "selective" is a bit odd.

    A fact is a fact. Whatever the weight was it will never change the fact Cotto was stopped by Pac. And that is the only fact I am reporting.

    I honestly have no idea whether Cotto got the shit beat out of him because of the weight. That's impossible to prove. Even if Cotto beat Pac at 154 it still wouldn't prove it. There are a multitude of excuses available to fighters for every contest.

    I'm not interested in excuses.


    No Fenster.... of course you're not interested in excuses. Not unless they serve YOUR agenda, of course.






    "Congratulations David Haye. Magnificent effort. Fact."
    The "experts" predicted an easy KO for Wlad. He would take Haye "whenever he felt like it"

    Instead we saw SIZE determine the outcome.

    A good big man beats a good little man.

    Well done Wlad.




    Of course, you already had no credibility to begin with.

    Err.. how did I make an excuse?

    Wlad the big man, beat Haye the little man. Good big men beating good little men is pretty much the norm.

    Although Cotto-Pac is an exception. The little dude beat the shit out of the big dude. Funny how it goes sometimes
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What's next for Cotto

    What on earth are you all arguing about?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3126
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What's next for Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    What on earth are you all arguing about?
    I'm not arguing about anything.

    I've merely stated an unequivocal fact that Cotto lost to Pac.

    Some people seem to have taken umbrage with this. I have no idea why. It's like trying to argue they don't don't need oyxgen to breathe. Weird.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What's next for Cotto

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    What on earth are you all arguing about?
    I'm not arguing about anything.

    I've merely stated an unequivocal fact that Cotto lost to Pac.

    Some people seem to have taken umbrage with this. I have no idea why. It's like trying to argue they don't don't need oyxgen to breathe. Weird.
    No, it's just funny.

    I watched Once upon a time in the West yesterday. Nice film. I enjoyed that.

    Please continue!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,784
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2029
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What's next for Cotto

    [QUOTE=Fenster;1071045][QUOTE=TitoFan;1071035][QUOTE=Fenster;1071029]
    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Cotto abandoned his fight plan against Pac because he got the fuck beat out of him by a superior fighter. Simple as.

    Cotto is a great fighter that put up a great performance against Floyd.

    You can give him huge credit without making silly excuses for his previous defeats. Lets keep it real.

    This makes no sense. I'd say that he "got the fuck beat out of him" BECAUSE he abandoned his fight plan, not the other way around. And since when can't we speculate on how fighter "X" would've done in a fight under other circumstances? Oh yeah, right..... 'cause it's Cotto, the fighter you love to hate.

    Cotto fought a level fight for two rounds, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 3rd, got seriously hurt and knocked down in the 4th, then fought the rest of the fight completely on the defensive trying to survive, before finally being saved from the torture.

    Pac beat the shit out of Cotto. Floyd boxed the shit out of Cotto. He did well in both fights.

    No excuses needed. Fact.
    How is stating a fact being "selective?"

    If you want to add to my fact that's entirely up to you.

    Cotto agreed to the catchweight. If fighting at 145 was such a major handicap he should have refused. He didn't. It's impossible to prove he lost because of the weight. That is purely opinion.

    What we do know for certain though is - Pac beat the shit out of him. Fact.
    I already gave you an example of how you were being selective so I'm not going to repeat myself. You stated "a" fact but chose to omit others. Hence you were selective (Hopefully you now understand the word "selective"..you're welcome)

    More facts :- Team Pac have been known to say things like "We knew he'd be weaker at xxx lbs"

    Or when Mosley wanted to fight Pac before Floyd signed to fight him "We'll only fight you at 142..you're not the same as Oscar"

    I like this "Fact" game...do you have any facts for me about why they wanted Miguel again at 145 despite beating the crap out of him last time for the 147 title?


    If we have no proof that the weight was the deciding factor, then neither do Team Pac. So it would have made sense, especially now, to rematch Miguel at a comfortable weight and outshine Floyd..also pick up a nice payday and some high ppv numbers.

    I have a feeling they know what's up..
    Your interpretation of the word "selective" is a bit odd.

    A fact is a fact. Whatever the weight was it will never change the fact Cotto was stopped by Pac. And that is the only fact I am reporting.

    I honestly have no idea whether Cotto got the shit beat out of him because of the weight. That's impossible to prove. Even if Cotto beat Pac at 154 it still wouldn't prove it. There are a multitude of excuses available to fighters for every contest.

    I'm not interested in excuses.


    No Fenster.... of course you're not interested in excuses. Not unless they serve YOUR agenda, of course.






    "Congratulations David Haye. Magnificent effort. Fact."
    The "experts" predicted an easy KO for Wlad. He would take Haye "whenever he felt like it"

    Instead we saw SIZE determine the outcome.

    A good big man beats a good little man.

    Well done Wlad.

    Of course, you already had no credibility to begin with.

    Err.. how did I make an excuse?

    Wlad the big man, beat Haye the little man. Good big men beating good little men is pretty much the norm.

    Although Cotto-Pac is an exception. The little dude beat the shit out of the big dude. Funny how it goes sometimes


    "Instead we saw SIZE determine the outcome." = excuse

    Carry on.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 66
    Last Post: 12-01-2011, 09:01 PM
  2. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-19-2008, 10:28 AM
  3. Why Cotto-Dela Hoya is good for Cotto-Mayweather
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-16-2007, 03:52 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-23-2006, 07:43 PM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 10:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing