Re: Non-British perspective: Froch easier to like than was Calzaghe

Originally Posted by
p4pking
I'm fairly sure all anyone has done is rate Frochs
opposition higher than Calzaghes, no? Your first sentence all but defeats itself. Fact

.
I was responding to this.

Originally Posted by
Althugz
My main point is - when being ranked Carl Froch should be ranked higher than Joe Calzaghe. I don't see an argument to have it any other way.
1. I've already showed why that doesn't work.
2. How can Froch's opposition be that much superior when Calzaghe BEAT a man Froch LOST against?
It's a silly argument. You might as well say Glenn Johnson is the greatest of all time because, although he lost a million times, he fought everyone.
Froch has arguably had the toughest run of fights in supermiddle history. Tougher than not just Calzaghe's but - Jones, Toney, Benn, Eubank, Collins, Kessler, Ward, etc
It doesn't mean he rates ABOVE them. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks