Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: Pavlik running his mouth about Carl Froch

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1342
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pavlik running his mouth about Carl Froch

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Pavlik To Froch: Not Impressed, I'll KO You, No Chin Bute - Boxing News

    This really annoys me reading this shit. Froch is a million times more of an athlete than that unprofessional alcoholic who cancels whole cards last minute because of his unprofessionalism. Get a grip Pavlik, you have done shit since being schooled by Martinez. He would get destroyed by Froch, I have no doubt about that. No way would Pavlik stop Froch, is he for real?
    In his defense, there were internet articles that Froch was considering Pavik for a tune-up fight. I can understand why Pavlik feel would feel slighted if that were the case. I actually think Froch versus Pavlik, if Pavlik is in good shape and spirit, is a good scrap.
    It is a good fight , but Froch would beat him down the stretch. His inactivity and alcohol abuse wouldnt have helped him out at all. Especially if he was fighting a strong 168 fighter like Froch. Pavlik is untested at 168 and someone as good as Froch would be too much for him I think. I think Froch would win a UD, and I think the fight would be similar to the Johnson one.
    not to stir up the pot but you know that Froch won by SD against Johnson right? he didn't win easy by any means so if you're saying that Pavlik/Froch would be similar you're saying that Pavlik very well can back up his claim
    Well it was a MD decision and I don't know how the one judge scored it a draw because I had Froch winning a competitive UD. That's how I think a Pavlik fight would go down too. Pavlik would make it competitive but would lose on the cards.
    i thought that Froch only pulled it out cause he won the championship rounds, other than that it was a damn close fight so again if a Pavlik fight be similar it would be far from Froch mopping the floor with him

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1859
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Pavlik To Froch: Not Impressed, I'll KO You, No Chin Bute - Boxing News

    This really annoys me reading this shit. Froch is a million times more of an athlete than that unprofessional alcoholic who cancels whole cards last minute because of his unprofessionalism. Get a grip Pavlik, you have done shit since being schooled by Martinez. He would get destroyed by Froch, I have no doubt about that. No way would Pavlik stop Froch, is he for real?
    In his defense, there were internet articles that Froch was considering Pavik for a tune-up fight. I can understand why Pavlik feel would feel slighted if that were the case. I actually think Froch versus Pavlik, if Pavlik is in good shape and spirit, is a good scrap.
    It is a good fight , but Froch would beat him down the stretch. His inactivity and alcohol abuse wouldnt have helped him out at all. Especially if he was fighting a strong 168 fighter like Froch. Pavlik is untested at 168 and someone as good as Froch would be too much for him I think. I think Froch would win a UD, and I think the fight would be similar to the Johnson one.
    not to stir up the pot but you know that Froch won by SD against Johnson right? he didn't win easy by any means so if you're saying that Pavlik/Froch would be similar you're saying that Pavlik very well can back up his claim
    Well it was a MD decision and I don't know how the one judge scored it a draw because I had Froch winning a competitive UD. That's how I think a Pavlik fight would go down too. Pavlik would make it competitive but would lose on the cards.
    i thought that Froch only pulled it out cause he won the championship rounds, other than that it was a damn close fight so again if a Pavlik fight be similar it would be far from Froch mopping the floor with him
    One judge had him 5 rounds up and another had him 4 up I think. That's pretty much how I had it. It wasnt close, but it was competitive. That's how I think a Pavlik fight would go down.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1308
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pavlik running his mouth about Carl Froch

    There are bad style match-ups for everyone out there. Kelly Pavlik needs to avoid athletic, slick boxers. It's his kriptonite. Froch isn't that. However, I'm not sold on Pavlik at 168. I always thought part of the reason he got to the elite level at middleweight was because he was a huge middleweight. He doesn't have that advantage at 168. I like the fight. However, Kessler-Froch II is better.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1859
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    There are bad style match-ups for everyone out there. Kelly Pavlik needs to avoid athletic, slick boxers. It's his kriptonite. Froch isn't that. However, I'm not sold on Pavlik at 168. I always thought part of the reason he got to the elite level at middleweight was because he was a huge middleweight. He doesn't have that advantage at 168. I like the fight. However, Kessler-Froch II is better.
    Fully agreed on everything said here.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Carl Froch
    By LukeH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-27-2012, 08:37 AM
  2. Kelly pavlik vs Carl froch
    By Dropanuke in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 09:34 AM
  3. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 08:41 AM
  4. Kelly Pavlik v. Carl Froch
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-12-2008, 05:47 PM
  5. Mora in the running to fight Pavlik too...
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 10-09-2007, 10:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing