Yet again he fails to answer a single boxing related question posed by The Fenster and offers nothing but insults.
@TitoFan
Do you not agree that a fighter who has suffered numerous knock downs against B/C-grade opposition is potentially at greater risk against A-grade opposition? It's as simple as 2+2 = 4.
I am merely providing a standard mathematical structure that encompasses the laws of probability. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
I answered. You don't want to listen.
When you're ready to have a serious debate without the bullshit, get back to me.
End of story.
What am I not being serious about?
Tito got knocked down on numerous occasions. The higher calibre opponent you face the more likely you are to be knocked down, especially if that higher calibre opponent has serious power, therefore Shane KO's Tito on this basic but structually granite formula.
Tito was knocked down by far inferior fighters to Shane. Right?
I can't conclusively prove that Shane would KO Tito but the mathematics indicate it's a virtual certainty. Fact.
I'm just providing the results of the research.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
You chose to ignore the FACTS about the Trinidad knockdowns EARLY in his career. The facts I put in front of your face. I will not answer the same questions twice. You keep asking the same question after you've been given an answer.... you do not deserve any more of my time. Now go play in the middle of the street.
Tito was stopped by Hopkins in his 41st fight and knocked down by Roy in his 45th.
Early, middle and late - in his career - Tito hit the deck. It's just an undeniable fact.
By that rationale I believe Mosely, who would have been one of the superior opponents Tito faced, had a strong mathematical chance of rendering him unconcious.
The Fenster never ignores facts. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Now you're starting to subtly change your tune, and looking ignorant in the process. The Hopkins and Jones Jr. knockdowns were very different from the knockdowns Trinidad suffered early in his career. The early ones were caused by lack of proper balance by Trinidad. The fact that he immediately bounced up (unhurt) and KO'ed the opponent (in each case) is proof of that. Only an idiot will continue to ignore that fact. Surely you're not an idiot, correct? The Hopkins and Jones Jr. knockdowns occurred late in each fight. Trinidad was clearly losing the fight and had been dominated in each case. Hence, the late knockdowns.
You started the argument by ignorantly saying Trinidad had a "china-chin". You've subtly eased off that, but still pursue the argument that since Trinidad suffered various knockdowns, Mosley would KO him. Faulty reasoning, for the reasons I've given above.
To this point, I've humored you and good-naturedly taken the bait you've hung out there, in the spirit of maintaining a good argument back and forth. But I will not answer your questions twice. I've already done that in this post, by once again explaining to you the nature of Trinidad's early knockdowns. Now... as the moderator you are... I expect you to be more of an example to our young, impressionable posters. But if you persist in your asinine arguments, in which you've proceeded to look like quite the fool, you're going to leave me no choice but to ignore your ass altogether.
You see... I only engage in intelligent arguments.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks