Big larry o tests positives for steriods

[Beanz]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

[0james0]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

Dragging it into the gutter is a bit harsh. I understand your point, why give exposure to someone who least deserves it? But I don't think it's reason enough for us to miss out on asking questions to someone with such an interesting story.

Tyson was convicted of god knows what, yet I'd be first in line to ask him a question. Larry is no Tyson, but he is a very interesting pro boxer. One with many questions to answer.

Saddo has more connections than a new TV, and better, more tasteful people to question will be along

It's relevant and I think an interesting opportunity. If it turns out to be gash, full of poor excuses and spin, it will simply get deleted.

[Beanz]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

Dragging it into the gutter is a bit harsh. I understand your point, why give exposure to someone who least deserves it? But I don't think it's reason enough for us to miss out on asking questions to someone with such an interesting story.

Tyson was convicted of god knows what, yet I'd be first in line to ask him a question. Larry is no Tyson, but he is a very interesting pro boxer. One with many questions to answer.

Saddo has more connections than a new TV, and better, more tasteful people to question will be along

It's relevant and I think an interesting opportunity. If it turns out to be gash, full of poor excuses and spin, it will simply get deleted.

You had the original idea mate so if your happy who am I to deny people the opportunity to question who they like.

[imp]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

This is true.

2012 is the uk olympics. We dont need another dwain chambers. Whats next? A book deal? Trip to the inner city to tell the youths not to take drugs?
Its been done already.
Just cause my mate is shagging his dads girlfriend..doesnt mean i have too.lol

[Althugz]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

So using your warped logic we'd also disgrace ourselves by asking questions to guys like Roy Jones, Peterson, Berto, Vargas, Margarito, Mosley, Holyfield...for the same reasons that they did Peds?

Your personal dislike for me is so transparent and pathetic that you'd try to rob the forum of an interview they want just to make a point against me. Ego.

It really doesn't matter to me and I'm sure it doesn't bother Larry one way or another whether we do this or not. If people don't want it, I don't have to arrange it. I just thought it would be a cool idea to kick things off with as I'm sure a lot of posters have questions they'd like to ask him at this point. Hence why I suggested it.

A friend of mine's father once described somebody as "A poisonous, odious little cunt" - I think I've found another perfect fit for that description. Do one, Greenbeanz.

[Beanz]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

So using your warped logic we'd also disgrace ourselves by asking questions to guys like Roy Jones, Peterson, Berto, Vargas, Margarito, Mosley, Holyfield...for the same reasons that they did Peds?

Your personal dislike for me is so transparent and pathetic that you'd try to rob the forum of an interview they want just to make a point against me. Ego.

It really doesn't matter to me and I'm sure it doesn't bother Larry one way or another whether we do this or not. If people don't want it, I don't have to arrange it. I just thought it would be a cool idea to kick things off with as I'm sure a lot of posters have questions they'd like to ask him at this point. Hence why I suggested it.

A friend of mine's father once described somebody as "A poisonous, odious little cunt" - I think I've found another perfect fit for that description. Do one, Greenbeanz.

With all due respect Larry does not belong in the same sentence as "..Roy Jones, Peterson, Berto, Vargas, Margarito, Mosley, Holyfield" As for robbing the forum of an interview if my views carried that much weight I am sure this place would be far less interesting. I merely posited an opinion and one I am not alone in sharing. I do not have such a personal dislike for you that I would behave as childishly as you are suggesting and you really are not so important that I would resort to the kind of name calling you started by suggesting people who appreciated Calzaghe were participating in a wank circle. You lack proportionate response because you have a persecution complex, I would never use the c word in describing you because I save that for friends whom I may disagree with, but respect like @Gandalf @El Kabong the c***s