Big larry o tests positives for steriods

[0james0]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

Dragging it into the gutter is a bit harsh. I understand your point, why give exposure to someone who least deserves it? But I don't think it's reason enough for us to miss out on asking questions to someone with such an interesting story.

Tyson was convicted of god knows what, yet I'd be first in line to ask him a question. Larry is no Tyson, but he is a very interesting pro boxer. One with many questions to answer.

Saddo has more connections than a new TV, and better, more tasteful people to question will be along

It's relevant and I think an interesting opportunity. If it turns out to be gash, full of poor excuses and spin, it will simply get deleted.

[Beanz]

Why should Saddo provide a forum for it to be dragged into the gutter by questioning someone like Larry? The ask a boxer idea is a great one but to start it off by asking a banned disgraced ex-boxer is surely missing an opportunity. Just because Althugz knows him all of a sudden he assumes that he will be the one to arrange it. Saddo and dozens of posters on here are more than capable of arranging interviews with more deserving candidates who know what it is to be a boxer without trying to take the easy way to the top.

Dragging it into the gutter is a bit harsh. I understand your point, why give exposure to someone who least deserves it? But I don't think it's reason enough for us to miss out on asking questions to someone with such an interesting story.

Tyson was convicted of god knows what, yet I'd be first in line to ask him a question. Larry is no Tyson, but he is a very interesting pro boxer. One with many questions to answer.

Saddo has more connections than a new TV, and better, more tasteful people to question will be along

It's relevant and I think an interesting opportunity. If it turns out to be gash, full of poor excuses and spin, it will simply get deleted.

You had the original idea mate so if your happy who am I to deny people the opportunity to question who they like.