Cotto seeking 4th title

[Violent Demise]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

[TitoFan]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

VD..... Fuckster and I have a long history of NEVER seeing eye-to-eye. He actively seeks out threads he otherwise has no interest in..... just so he can counter whatever I'm saying. Even if he doesn't know the first thing about it. So don't judge my "fan-dom" based on my reaction to the little squirt.

[Fenster]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

VD..... Fuckster and I have a long history of NEVER seeing eye-to-eye. He actively seeks out threads he otherwise has no interest in..... just so he can counter whatever I'm saying. Even if he doesn't know the first thing about it. So don't judge my "fan-dom" based on my reaction to the little squirt.

Are you utterly insane? I follow you around the board? Of the last FIFTEEN threads you've made I've posted in ONE of them. ONE!!! I read a tiny percentage of your posts.

This thread is a prime example of your delusion. Four people took umbrage with VD's vacant title info. I ask why? I didn't specifically address you. Yet you reply with "wipe VD's sperm off your lips."

Just yesterday you mentioned my name in a thread that I hadn't even posted in. Another poster (Beanz) told you to "stop baiting." You're the one running round mentioning "Fuckster" yet you accuse me of actively seeking you out?

You are either very delusional/arrogant or mentally unstable.

[TitoFan]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

VD..... Fuckster and I have a long history of NEVER seeing eye-to-eye. He actively seeks out threads he otherwise has no interest in..... just so he can counter whatever I'm saying. Even if he doesn't know the first thing about it. So don't judge my "fan-dom" based on my reaction to the little squirt.

Are you utterly insane? I follow you around the board? Of the last FIFTEEN threads you've made I've posted in ONE of them. ONE!!! I read a tiny percentage of your posts.

This thread is a prime example of your delusion. Four people took umbrage with VD's vacant title info. I ask why? I didn't specifically address you. Yet you reply with "wipe VD's sperm off your lips."

Just yesterday you mentioned my name in a thread that I hadn't even posted in. Another poster (Beanz) told you to "stop baiting." You're the one running round mentioning "Fuckster" yet you accuse me of actively seeking you out?

You are either very delusional/arrogant or mentally unstable.

You read "a tiny percentage" of my posts...... yet you answer the vast majority of them. That, my non-friend, is a very amazing feat. Give yourself a pat on the back.

And the only sign of "mental unstability" I have is that I keep answering your smart-ass posts, against my better judgement.

[Fenster]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

VD..... Fuckster and I have a long history of NEVER seeing eye-to-eye. He actively seeks out threads he otherwise has no interest in..... just so he can counter whatever I'm saying. Even if he doesn't know the first thing about it. So don't judge my "fan-dom" based on my reaction to the little squirt.

Are you utterly insane? I follow you around the board? Of the last FIFTEEN threads you've made I've posted in ONE of them. ONE!!! I read a tiny percentage of your posts.

This thread is a prime example of your delusion. Four people took umbrage with VD's vacant title info. I ask why? I didn't specifically address you. Yet you reply with "wipe VD's sperm off your lips."

Just yesterday you mentioned my name in a thread that I hadn't even posted in. Another poster (Beanz) told you to "stop baiting." You're the one running round mentioning "Fuckster" yet you accuse me of actively seeking you out?

You are either very delusional/arrogant or mentally unstable.

You read "a tiny percentage" of my posts...... yet you answer the vast majority of them. That, my non-friend, is a very amazing feat. Give yourself a pat on the back.

And the only sign of "mental unstability" I have is that I keep answering your smart-ass posts, against my better judgement.

I reply to the "vast majority" of your posts? You are completely mental. I've barely read a single thing you've ever posted unless it was addressed directly to me. I couldn't even recall a small handful of your posts.

All I know about you is this - if I say something you disagree with, instead of arguing your corner, you get upset and hurl a ton of insults at me. You're just the guy that gets upset over nothing. That's it.

[DavilaJones]

I wonder how Cotto will manage middleweight, because even for jr middle he does seem a bit small. I wish he would have fought Chavez before the Martinez fight and it would have been the battle of the left hooks. Now that would be something to see.

[TitoFan]

I wonder how Cotto will manage middleweight, because even for jr middle he does seem a bit small. I wish he would have fought Chavez before the Martinez fight and it would have been the battle of the left hooks. Now that would be something to see.

I think Cotto's a little undersized for MW. He's 5'-7", and middleweights typically average around 5'-11" to 6-feet. Cotto's power will do less against the big middleweights, whereas a hard-punching middleweight would def have the power to hurt Cotto. Cotto has adapted incredibly well to different styles, especially now with Pedro Diaz in his corner. But I don't know how far that could take Miguel against elite middleweights.

[Violent Demise]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

VD..... Fuckster and I have a long history of NEVER seeing eye-to-eye. He actively seeks out threads he otherwise has no interest in..... just so he can counter whatever I'm saying. Even if he doesn't know the first thing about it. So don't judge my "fan-dom" based on my reaction to the little squirt.

Yeah he clearly went out of his way to attack you. Surprised he wasn't bad for it

[TitoFan]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

VD..... Fuckster and I have a long history of NEVER seeing eye-to-eye. He actively seeks out threads he otherwise has no interest in..... just so he can counter whatever I'm saying. Even if he doesn't know the first thing about it. So don't judge my "fan-dom" based on my reaction to the little squirt.

Yeah he clearly went out of his way to attack you. Surprised he wasn't bad for it

I'm not sure whether you're agreeing with me for real, so excuse the look of shocked disbelief on my face. But yeah..... Fenster wouldn't normally give a rat's ass about this particular thread, other than to quickly pick whatever side I'm not on.

[Peter Som]

Cotto is a great fighter. Barring robbery or anything of that nature, if Cotto commits to this and wins, he'll deserve it. If whoever who he's matched up with wins, that boxer would deserve it also.

[Fenster]

Two things wrong with this argument:

1. Your half-hearted, half-assed references to Cotto's title opponents does little to take away from the fact you've called Cotto overrated, a quitter, and worse. But whatever. Whatever floats your boat.

2. You OBVIOUSLY have never read my own posts where I'm critical of Cotto in several aspects. Does that sound like someone who's blinded as a fan? I don't have to go into specifics. Look it up yourself. I've criticized several things regarding Cotto throughout his career. Yes I'm a fan. But I'm not as blind as you'd have people think.


Put your anger and your bias aside for a bit, and no doubt you'll see the truth in what I'm saying.

Your reaction to Fenster (a poster I rarely see eye to eye with) simply agreeing with my statement says otherwise.

VD..... Fuckster and I have a long history of NEVER seeing eye-to-eye. He actively seeks out threads he otherwise has no interest in..... just so he can counter whatever I'm saying. Even if he doesn't know the first thing about it. So don't judge my "fan-dom" based on my reaction to the little squirt.

Yeah he clearly went out of his way to attack you. Surprised he wasn't bad for it

I'm not sure whether you're agreeing with me for real, so excuse the look of shocked disbelief on my face. But yeah..... Fenster wouldn't normally give a rat's ass about this particular thread, other than to quickly pick whatever side I'm not on.

You are completey deluded.

I made my post after reading p4pking's. I didn't quote you or name you.

Why would I not give a rats arse about a boxing thread on a boxing forum that I visit every day? I've posted about hundreds of different fights/fighters in the eight years i've been coming here. I first saw Cotto fight against Justin Juuko 10 years ago. I've seen virtually every fight he's had since then. So why would I not be interested in this topic?