Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Where to you rank Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

Voters
26. This poll is closed
  • #1

    0 0%
  • #2 to #5

    1 3.85%
  • #6 to #10

    7 26.92%
  • #11 to #15

    8 30.77%
  • #16 to #25

    5 19.23%
  • #26 to #35

    2 7.69%
  • #36 to #50

    1 3.85%
  • #51 to #100

    1 3.85%
  • Below the top 100

    1 3.85%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Wlad's win over Haye seems a bit better now because of Haye's impressive showing yesterday.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    757
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    693
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Greatest eastern european HW so far. Compartmentalising wlad and labelling him with a no. makes others feel wlad is not as big a threat toward's there hero's hence he will never get close to the american top 10. Truth is none of those men fought in a global era of the sport, half of them would be CW's/LHW'S today and prime wlad would be a massive threat to anyone, ever! Who care's if someone stick's him between a pair of number's! Truth is he would anihilate i.e joe frazier RIP.
    Last edited by THE PHILOSOPHER; 07-16-2012 at 04:08 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1441
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHER View Post
    Greatest eastern european HW so far. Compartmentalising wlad and labelling him with a no. makes others feel wlad is not as big a threat toward's there hero's hence he will never get close to the american top 10. Truth is none of those men fought in a global era of the sport. And prime wlad would be a massive threat to anyone! Who care's if someone stick's him between a pair of number's! Truth is he would anihilate joe frazier RIP.
    No chance. Joe was cut from a much tougher cloth than anyone around now and he took shots off a man who would decapitate either Klit and just kept coming until the ref couldn't let it go anymore. FACT.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    i have to say i dont think joe frazier could beat either klit

    he might be cruiserweight champ tho
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHER View Post
    Greatest eastern european HW so far. Compartmentalising wlad and labelling him with a no. makes others feel wlad is not as big a threat toward's there hero's hence he will never get close to the american top 10. Truth is none of those men fought in a global era of the sport, half of them would be CW's/LHW'S today and prime wlad would be a massive threat to anyone, ever! Who care's if someone stick's him between a pair of number's! Truth is he would anihilate i.e joe frazier RIP.


    I'm not sure whether I interpreted this correctly. Would you care to elaborate?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,012
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    713
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    I think in an ever expanding and ever changing list the only 'fair' and cohesive way you can rank anyone is doing by an era rather than all time.

    The simple fact that improvements in health science has changed our height and diet, that alone is a major major factor. Lets not forget conditioning and supplemental nutrition fighters take now. All these play a major factor and we haven't even touched the part about the fighters innate skills, fight style, or resume.

    However if I had a gun put to my head I would put both brothers at top 15 with Vitali far ahead of wlad. I think his sense of timing and his more consistent use of the jab and the actual ability to fight on the inside elevates him in the ranks

  7. #7
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    I'm not sure whether I interpreted this correctly. Would you care to elaborate?
    I'll guess that he was referring to The Cold War era and how over time there have been more and more fighters coming from the former Soviet states.


    I don't rate Wladimir top 10 yet, but he's not far off. Wladimir has been a dominant champion and looks to continue that for the foreseeable future. Wlad has a great record in title fights, he's defended his title often and with great success, and given what he personally has control of he's been an All-Time great boxer. The things Wladimir cannot control do not help his case, but they shouldn't hurt it so much either, he's in a "weak era", he has 0 true rivals...the closest guys would have to be Chris Byrd and shit I can't even think of anyone else, but he wins, he wins by KO and he's a brilliant technical fighter. Certainly people consider being a great technical fighter boring, but Tim Duncan is a boring basketball player, but it doesn't make him bad. By the end of his career wladimir Klitschko will be a top 10 heavyweight of All-Time.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    I'm not sure whether I interpreted this correctly. Would you care to elaborate?
    I'll guess that he was referring to The Cold War era and how over time there have been more and more fighters coming from the former Soviet states.


    I don't rate Wladimir top 10 yet, but he's not far off. Wladimir has been a dominant champion and looks to continue that for the foreseeable future. Wlad has a great record in title fights, he's defended his title often and with great success, and given what he personally has control of he's been an All-Time great boxer. The things Wladimir cannot control do not help his case, but they shouldn't hurt it so much either, he's in a "weak era", he has 0 true rivals...the closest guys would have to be Chris Byrd and shit I can't even think of anyone else, but he wins, he wins by KO and he's a brilliant technical fighter. Certainly people consider being a great technical fighter boring, but Tim Duncan is a boring basketball player, but it doesn't make him bad. By the end of his career wladimir Klitschko will be a top 10 heavyweight of All-Time.


    Good post, Lyle. You're by far the biggest Klitschko fan on this forum.... but this is one of your more objective posts so far on the subject of Wlad. And yes.... there are things outside of Wlad's control. And yes.... he's got no true rivals (damn it!!), and that hurts him some. IMO, it also hurts him some that lately his procession of hapless victims....er.... I mean.... opponents... have entered the ring with only "survival" on their minds. Again, not in Wlad's control. The IBF choosing Thompson (again) as his mandatory..... out of Wlad's control.

    I also feel that if he keeps busy and continues to mow down his opponents.... he should be considered as one of the top all-time HW's. How high he'll be ranked will always be a matter of personal opinion, but he'll certainly be ranked highly. If some of these highly touted HW prospects develop quickly and can challenge Wlad while he's still active.... and if these fights can be quality fights.... THAT will help Wlad's final place among history's heavyweight champions.

    He started out on shaky ground with 3 KO losses, but at least he avenged one of those. Yes.... he's a bit too cautious sometimes for my personal liking, but a lot of that is on the challenger. If you're going to allow me to jab the crap out of you and you're not even going to attempt to take my title..... I'm more than willing to accomodate you. I'm still waiting and crossing my fingers hoping someone eventually shows up to fight.

    I chose to address your response rather than the "Philosopher's", for obvious reasons. To claim "Americans fought mainly Americans" and that boxing corruption was limited to the last century, IMO does not even warrant a response.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    757
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    693
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHER View Post
    Greatest eastern european HW so far. Compartmentalising wlad and labelling him with a no. makes others feel wlad is not as big a threat toward's there hero's hence he will never get close to the american top 10. Truth is none of those men fought in a global era of the sport, half of them would be CW's/LHW'S today and prime wlad would be a massive threat to anyone, ever! Who care's if someone stick's him between a pair of number's! Truth is he would anihilate i.e joe frazier RIP.


    I'm not sure whether I interpreted this correctly. Would you care to elaborate?
    It's quite simple...soviets and cubans did not turn pro up until a decade or so ago. Cubans rarely defect even now but they are trickling through (see the castillo brothers, solis, mike perez etc)

    Americans fought mainly americans with a frew brits and the odd european chucked in. It's much more diverse nowadays. Plus half of the last boxing century was corrupt!
    Last edited by THE PHILOSOPHER; 07-19-2012 at 03:09 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,173
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1871
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    20 at best

    Whoever said he has either won easily or lost easily had it right .

    Though didn't someone once deck him twice yet he went on to win ? Can't remember who it was and never saw the fight so don't know how deep a trouble he was actually in ?

    Anyway apart from that he has always been safety first and let little guys take him to the late rounds when he should have had them out of there inside of 3.

    And for all the slagging off Haye got for not engaging with Wlad, Wlad never lived up to his pre fight pledge to KO Haye either
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  11. #11
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Wladimir fought Sam Peter after the losses to Sanders & Brewster & the piss poor showing vs Williamson and AT THE TIME this was seen as a crossroads bout with Wlad on the decline and Sam Peter seemingly being "the next big thing". That was a huge win for Wladimir, it turned his career around entirely he was knocked down a total of 3 times though some people question where the punches landed although Wladimir never looked to the ref for help and never complained. The win vs Peter was HUGE, he's barely lost a round since then.

    Top 20...bah....go ahead and name better 19 better heavyweights than Wladimir. Sure others have had harder eras, but there have been others with weaker eras and they haven't accomplished what Wladimir has done. Wlad is a great champion.

    as for letting little guys go deep into fights with him...Johnson-Ketchel anyone? Marciano-Charles? Holyfield-Moorer?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,173
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1871
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Right Lyle - see fact below.

    in his prime Frank Bruno would have knocked out Wlad.

    I rest my case
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    781
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Whoever you pick to beat Wladimir has to be big, fast, have a powerful jab, a fair punch and plenty of experience. Lewis, Foreman, Ali and Holmes come to mind. In their prime and on a good day they could get the job done. Look around, do you see anyone like that? One thing I forgot, they need a good chin too.
    Big, fast, powerful jab, decent power, plenty of experience and a good chin.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom View Post
    Wlad's win over Haye seems a bit better now because of Haye's impressive showing yesterday.
    True, but Wlad's method against Haye was different altogether from Chisora's.
    Another thing is Haye's beating of Chisora does not mean that Wlad could do the same.
    They are different fighters with different attributes.
    Haye surprised me with his good performance against Chisora, and in fact against Wlad as well.
    Haye is a very good fighter.
    I still think that by the time Chisora fought Vitali, he would have posed a tougher test to Wlad, and to a lesser degree even now.
    Arreola is well past his prime by now, but a few years ago he could have been a threat to Wladimir.
    The same holds for Chisora, whose prime came about one or two years later but also passed in my opinion.
    Wars against Fury, Helenius, Vitali, Haye and to a lesser degree Sexton (twice) had surely taken their toll on Chisora.
    Fighters like Chisora, Arreola and Sam Peter have a style that is just not made to last for long.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    757
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    693
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Where do you rate Wladimir Klitschko among all-time heavyweights?

    Who voted #51 - #100? Hahahaha...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Rate this song: (if you have time :) )
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-15-2011, 01:26 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-24-2008, 03:06 AM
  3. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 08:19 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 07:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing