Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1398
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I know I'm in the minority when I say that this is the best news I've heard in ages!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    782
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I know I'm in the minority when I say that this is the best news I've heard in ages!
    Why not? If it makes boxing and boxers more competitive, who could be against it?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,012
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    713
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

    In honesty I really do hate jr's and super's of each division. Reason being is that generally most of the champs of those jr/super divisions have or will move to a division without a prefix. Ward will move to Light heavy, JMM was a lightweight extraordinaire. Cotto really still belongs in Welter. I dare say I totally agree with Teddy Atlas in that because they made easier to fight in a division you don't have the will or the drive anymore to strive for it.

    That being said I understand why heavyweight shouldn't be unlimited, however I doubt any heavyweight has been effective weighting over 250 pounds. If there must be a cut off weight for a super heavy I suppose 230 is pretty reasonable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    998
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

    Guys this is just another tax grab errr sanctioning fee grab and they are doing it right when cruiser is showing some promise. I don't understand why they bothered to move cruiser from 190 to 200 in 2001 let alone this move over a decade later. In addition there is simply not enough superheavyweights around and most of them fight like Carnera. I think its overkill and will do the reverse of what its supposed to do.

    Time will tell.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,782
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

    How long before we have:

    105-lb champion
    106-lb champion
    107-lb champion
    108-lb champion
    etc
    etc
    etc


    (You get the point).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,075
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5123
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

    A great idea for the the syndicate that is the wbc is to stop stripping the holders they already have in the first place. That brand is passed around as often as a packed Bong in Chavez jrs kitchen after midnight. Literally what...24, 25 "belts" already? They have a "Mundo hispano" champion for fooks sake.

    Not sure what article says exactly nor what Russia has to do with another division but if they are suggesting a trumped up cruiserweight class, the wbu already crowned a "champion" yrs ago in Bobby Czyz, cough, and they no longer exist. Pointless really.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    716
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1084
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I know I'm in the minority when I say that this is the best news I've heard in ages!
    Why not? If it makes boxing and boxers more competitive, who could be against it?
    Sarcasm?

    It makes it less competitive, the best fighter avoid each other bc they are in their own mini-division.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

    Weren't they going to start a super heavyweight division a year or two back? All this will do apart from give them more belts to get sanctioning fees off is devalue the heavyweight division even more, if that's possible.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1398
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Just we need in the Hev area, another division.

    Quote Originally Posted by boyla View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I know I'm in the minority when I say that this is the best news I've heard in ages!
    Why not? If it makes boxing and boxers more competitive, who could be against it?
    Sarcasm?

    It makes it less competitive, the best fighter avoid each other bc they are in their own mini-division.
    I think it goes a long way in bridging the gap with the lower divisions. Over the past 20 years there could have been some fantastic fights between one time 168-175ers and reduced 210ers.
    Ward vs Chambers for example.

    Hopkins v Etienne??

    Eubank vs Hyde even....

    It just gives the lovwerweight boxer more incentive to move from say 175er to fight a 190er knowing that guy has mixed in frequent company of 220ers and so on and so forth.....

    That just doesn't happen any more.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Area 51
    By ICB in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-21-2009, 10:07 AM
  2. Boxing in VA DC area?
    By Lion King in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-06-2007, 08:21 AM
  3. Boxing in VA & DC area
    By Lion King in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2007, 05:40 AM
  4. Chicago Area???
    By Delly in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-25-2007, 08:55 PM
  5. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 08-07-2007, 03:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing