Do people actually think Marciano would beat Ali?

[Dark Lord Al]

Frazier hit harder than Rocky with the left hook and Ali could take his he could take Rocky's.

and you dont think for instance Wlad hits harder than both ?
see my point ?

[Master]

Frazier hit harder than Rocky with the left hook and Ali could take his he could take Rocky's.

and you dont think for instance Wlad hits harder than both ?
see my point ?

I do but Wlad fights different to Rocky and Joe and they punched faster inside than he does so the fight would play out differently.

[Dark Lord Al]

Frazier hit harder than Rocky with the left hook and Ali could take his he could take Rocky's.

and you dont think for instance Wlad hits harder than both ?
see my point ?

I do but Wlad fights different to Rocky and Joe and they punched faster inside than he does so the fight would play out differently.

How often do u think Wlad will go on the inside against Clay ? and how in gods name does he not tire with an 18stone plus athlete leaning on him ?
BIG GEORGE was 16 -4 slugger , no way does Clay beat all of these massive top fighters.

[THE PHILOSOPHER]

Contrary to popular belief many of the post war era HW'S would have had a very good shot at beating ali. Tunney, charles, marciano etc.

[Dark Lord Al]

Contrary to popular belief many of the post war era HW'S would have had a very good shot at beating ali. Tunney, charles, marciano etc.

This is a good point , it makes me laugh when Clay fans think he could have beaten anyone or any era.

[Andre]

Contrary to popular belief many of the post war era HW'S would have had a very good shot at beating ali. Tunney, charles, marciano etc.

This is a good point , it makes me laugh when Clay fans think he could have beaten anyone or any era.

I recon Ali was more skillful and scientific than those others mentioned but also those others were made of sterner stuff. Marciano was a throw back slugger and wouldnt stay down either.

Greb and him would of been bloody.

[THE PHILOSOPHER]

Contrary to popular belief many of the post war era HW'S would have had a very good shot at beating ali. Tunney, charles, marciano etc.

This is a good point , it makes me laugh when Clay fans think he could have beaten anyone or any era.

I reckon Ali was more skillful and scientific than those others mentioned but also those others were made of sterner stuff. Marciano was a throw back slugger and wouldnt stay down either.

Greb and him would of been bloody.

No greb fights exsist to judge him so can't say. Tunney was a very scientific fighter though.

[Master]

Philosopher, we did not even see a peak Ali, he was exiled which meant his skills and speed deteriorated which allowed some great fights. Had Ali been allowed to carry on there would be no Frazier or Foreman epics.

Ali would not have allowed the Klits to even lean on him, he would circle the pair and out maneuvered them. Ali had the skill, speed, endurance and discipline to do it.

[ninjaspy3]

Contrary to popular belief many of the post war era HW'S would have had a very good shot at beating ali. Tunney, charles, marciano etc.

This is a good point , it makes me laugh when Clay fans think he could have beaten anyone or any era.

It makes me laugh too that after you yourself said Ali would beat Marciano, you then agreed with the Philosopher's statement which lists Marciano as one of the people who could beat Ali....