What myth?You keep perpetuating that myth hoping it will become real but Tyson fought a far more dangerous Rudduck twice so Foreman would have been easier. Foreman was happier to take on Holyfield instead.
What myth?You keep perpetuating that myth hoping it will become real but Tyson fought a far more dangerous Rudduck twice so Foreman would have been easier. Foreman was happier to take on Holyfield instead.
.....so let me get this straight Old George Foreman was still good enough to win THE heavyweight title but not good enough to beat Mike Tyson who was a damned train wreck at that point in time and who never held meaningful titles after he lost to Buster Douglas?
George Foreman ALWAYS beats Tyson...prime vs prime it's George's power and strength and in his older age it's a psychological war and Tyson just couldn't handle it. And yes it would look 100% like this
George Foreman learned a lot from Sonny as you can see just from the style in which he fought. Mike Tyson had Patterson's exact same style, exact same trainer, same fast hands, more power than Patterson (but Foreman had more power than Liston too), and he'd get dominated the same way Patterson did.
Just as I complement you in one post I have to disagree with you on another. Old Foreman won a title against a china chin Moorer who was beating him silly. Old Foreman never fought like that Sonny Liston you just showed he was slower and obvious had less stamina. Tyson fought the more dangerous Rudduck and if he could take his smash he would see out a victory against old Foreman.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks