
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy

Originally Posted by
jbp23
Seeing Marquez tonight brings up allot of questions. Now I am not a conspiracy theorist, actually in my line of work one only uses facts.
Marquez has never been so big and muscular, seeing him squat huge amounts of weight in the 24/7 episode was unreal.
Marquez has a known steroid peddler/manufacturer as his strength coach
This coach was hiding who he was by using an alias
This guy actually snitched on the athletes he was giving PEDS to, usually its the dealer who gets put on trial not the drug user. This shows the guy has no morals at all.
I think once a fighter brings in a known PED peddler onto his team then it's perfectly ok to be suspicious especially considering the character of this Angel Hernandez or whatever he wants to call himself now. Plus he seems to lie a lot by saying he is working with this group and that group to develop drug testing for boxing, when there is no evidence he is doing so. Here is an unusual lie he recently told:
"Heredia said he is going to meet with FDA special agent Jeff Novitzky, the man who broke the BALCO case, Thursday in Las Vegas and that Marquez will provide a blood and urine sample,Heredia portrayed it as evidence that he is cooperating and attempting to develop a program that could catch cheats in professional boxing. But Novitzky is a criminal investigator, not a man who would be setting testing protocols or even handling a blood or urine specimen." YahooSports
This is just an obvious lie and really brings up allot of questions. There are no pre-drug test screening for Marquez and Pacquiao so why would he be giving Marquez's blood and urine to anyone outside of the Nevada Athletic commission.
Those might want to say the same about Pacquiao, but its not the same thing. Pacquiao does not have a known PED peddler as a conditioning coach. I believe Marquez would do just about anything to get a win against his foe Pacquiao, just like Mosley was willing to do against De La Hoya and other fighters willing to do whatever to winexamples Margarito, Tarver, Vargas. Doing so would be easy for Marquez to rationalize it by thinking he was cheated out of the pat 3 fights with Pacqman.
I know I might get allot of shit for this, so go ahead and give it to me. By the way I am a big Marquez fan always have been. Thes are legit questions
JMM has not hidden who has been working with, changing his routine, looking to improve strength/power, commentators thought his size would work against him as he looked tighter and that Pac looked trimmer, looser and faster.
You know Hernadez personally to be able to comment on his character?
You're accusing Marquez of cheating?
Marquez said prior to the fight he'll take whatever test Roach/they want - Something Manny has refused to do and ruined the chance of fighting Mayweather. Ever since Mayweather accused Pac of cheating and the spotlight has been put on him Pac's performance has been getting worse...could be age/training or by your logic proof that he was cheating before.
You've only just registered and post this. Bitter Pac fan?
Do I know Hernandez no but his character or lack of is easily researched. He is an admitted PED peddler, he tried to hide who he is by using alias's but the press found out, he makes up stories about working with the USADA, he ratted out the athletes he was doping up to save his own ass and anyone anywhere knows nothing is worse than a snitch so I believe these easily researched facts show his character or lack of so I do not need to know him personally since there is a lot out there on him that shows the type of man he is.
Am I accusing Marquez of cheating? It's reasonable to believe he may have cheated based on the above noted facts and hiring a steroid peddler is the most damning fact of all. There is no logical reason to hire someone with this type of reputation as it will only invite suspicion and rightly so.
In an interview MArquez said he does not know how these questions came up, well its ebcause you hired known steroid peddler.
Are you saying having a steroid peddler/dealer is no reason to be suspicious? If you are saying so then you are naive.
Its funny how no one address the issues I brought up, they ignore them such as yourself. Why do you ignore them? Because its hard to counter them because they are all true.
So tell me his story about working with the USDA that turned out to be false, what does that tell you about him? Using an alias, what does that say about him? Being a PED peddler what does that tell you? None of that brings any suspicion? Man, all these problems do not raise any suspicion on your part then you are probably the easiest person in the world to scam, I bet telemarketers love you and you probably are broke because you sent all your money to some prince in Africa because you got an email from one stating he would make you rich. By the way just because I am new to this site does not mean I am new to boxing.
I have forgotten more about boxing than you will ever know.
Bookmarks