Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 98

Thread: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2090
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    What about the Pacquio benchmark though Fenster ? Seeing as how 100% of Hamed's embarassing, near shutout losses came at the hands of Mexican Pacman opponents it provides us with solid, FACTual data for comparison.

    Each fighter starts with 100 points.

    MAB lost 100% of his bouts with Pac, 50% of those by stoppage.
    We have to -100 for the lack of a W and -50 for the tko.

    For JMM we will grade him twice as to be unbiased - once based off general concensus and once based off of judges scores.

    Opinion/fact: JMM lost 0% of his bouts with Pac and stopped him once in four. We will award him a 25% bonus for that KO, for a score of 125

    Fact (disputed): JMM lost 50% of his bouts with pac, drew 25% and won 25% by KO. This leaves him with a final score of 95.5% (-50 for the losses, plus 17.5 for the draw and 25% for the KO. Still considerably higher than MABs MINUS 150.

    If -150 on the pacbaromoter is enough to secure a clear UD that saw Hamed do the chicken dance several times, then I cannot dispute that a score of either 125 or even 92.5 mean that Hamed doesn't see at least the 6th round.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    What about the Pacquio benchmark though Fenster ? Seeing as how 100% of Hamed's embarassing, near shutout losses came at the hands of Mexican Pacman opponents it provides us with solid, FACTual data for comparison.

    Each fighter starts with 100 points.

    MAB lost 100% of his bouts with Pac, 50% of those by stoppage.
    We have to -100 for the lack of a W and -50 for the tko.

    For JMM we will grade him twice as to be unbiased - once based off general concensus and once based off of judges scores.

    Opinion/fact: JMM lost 0% of his bouts with Pac and stopped him once in four. We will award him a 25% bonus for that KO, for a score of 125

    Fact (disputed): JMM lost 50% of his bouts with pac, drew 25% and won 25% by KO. This leaves him with a final score of 95.5% (-50 for the losses, plus 17.5 for the draw and 25% for the KO. Still considerably higher than MABs MINUS 150.

    If -150 on the pacbaromoter is enough to secure a clear UD that saw Hamed do the chicken dance several times, then I cannot dispute that a score of either 125 or even 92.5 mean that Hamed doesn't see at least the 6th round.
    A sober analysis of your data leads me to believe you are correct. The numbers are very revealing.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Further proof there are too many titles
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:08 PM
  2. No Proof That He's Guilty?
    By sanj16 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 12:02 AM
  3. Some proof against evolution
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing