Where do u place Morales Hamed Pacquiao Marquez barrera from each other?

[Violent Demise]

Juan Manuel Marquez
Erik Morales
Manny Pacquiao
Marco Antonio Barrera
Kennedy McKinney
Naseem Hamed

[bzkfn]

Juan Manuel Marquez
Erik Morales
Manny Pacquiao
Marco Antonio Barrera
Kennedy McKinney
Naseem Hamed

I love the way VD keeps bias out of the equation with his decision making.

[TitoFan]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

[GAME]

1. Barrera
2. Morales
3. Pacquiao
4. Marquez
5. Hamed

[DavilaJones]

Even though I thought Marquez won the first three fight, in terms of pure accomplishments there are no doubts that Manny is number 1, as for 2 to last. Hamed last the three mexicans a tie for 2nd place

[THE THIRD MAN]

Pacquiao
Marquez
Barrera
Morales








Hamed

[Julius Rain]

Can Naz really be place amongst those guys? All of those guys have lost or been down but continued on to be great.

Naz lost once and quit.

[bzkfn]

Can Naz really be place amongst those guys? All of those guys have lost or been down but continued on to be great.

Naz lost once and quit.

Hold on there just a second there Julius. Naz lost to Barrera yes, but he didn't just quit. He came back to beat the all time great that is Manuel Calvo. If you'd beaten Manuel Calvo, you'd know that you have nothing left to prove in your career. So in all honesty, where else would Naz go apart from retirement? He achieved something great there.

[erics44]

Naz
Pac
Barrera
Marquez
Moralez

[CutMeMick]

JMM
Pac
Erik
MAB
NAZ

[TitoFan]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

[erics44]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

the fact that people who are also the voters are so happy that Naz is in last , deems the results of the "poll" unreliable on the basis that the opinions of the votes are less than objective

[TitoFan]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

the fact that people who are also the voters are so happy that Naz is in last , deems the results of the "poll" unreliable on the basis that the opinions of the votes are less than objective

Don't shoot the messenger...... just saying it like it is.


BTW... you confirmed my bolded statement above. No middle ground. You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

[erics44]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

the fact that people who are also the voters are so happy that Naz is in last , deems the results of the "poll" unreliable on the basis that the opinions of the votes are less than objective

Don't shoot the messenger...... just saying it like it is.


BTW... you confirmed my bolded statement above. No middle ground. You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

further evidence that your vote is unreliable

[Fenster]

You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

There is no right or wrong answer to the question posed.

Therefore, your poll also indicates that two people - Fenster and Eric - are innovative free-thinking boxing intellectuals and nine people are mundane blatant haters. Fact.