Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 69

Thread: Addressing the PED problem

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,822
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Addressing the PED problem

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    This isn't about your ignorance about boxers, boxing history, or facts in general. It's about the dangers of PED use. If you think the only financial answer is to pass along the cost to the PPV customers, instead of taking a piece of the very large pie consumed by boxers and promoters.... then keep on thinking it. Personally, I'd rather try and do something to solve a very real problem, rather than just sitting with my thumbs up my ass fretting about boxers getting brain damaged.
    What pie is that? Only about 5% of current active boxers eat well. The rest struggle to get by. Some worse than others. To take another piece of there already shorted purse ain't right and shouldn't be done

    See below. You take a percentage of the promotional revenue, and maybe even draw a line below which you do not take a percentage. This would provide the much needed funds, without taxing the guys on the lower end of the totem pole.



    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Test the top-rated thousand boxers a dozen times a year and it's less than twenty million a year. Pay for it by billing each individual promotion on a sliding scale depending on how much the promotion makes in revenue (obviously Pac Marquez 4 pays a huge slice compared to some non-TV event that features some of the top thousand boxers) and it would work out as a really small promotional expense.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,822
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Addressing the PED problem

    Face it. The problem WILL be tackled sooner or later. Sooner would be better, and boxing would be seen as proactive. Later means we would wait until some poor bastard died in the ring from getting hammered by a PED-powered opponent... and then everybody would throw their hands up in the air and say "hey, I guess we better do something."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1006
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Addressing the PED problem

    Roach used twisted packing tape to wrap Oscars hands. And the relationship to peds would be?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    789
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Roach used twisted packing tape to wrap Oscars hands. And the relationship to peds would be?

    Let's stay on track. If anyone believes there is not enough money in boxing to do PED testing fairly, without an undo burden on anybody they don't know boxing.
    Don't fret about the money, worry about finding somebody we can trust to oversee the the whole thing.
    Someone or some org. without a financial interest in boxing that everyone can trust to be fair.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1368
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Addressing the PED problem

    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post

    If anyone believes there is not enough money in boxing to do PED testing fairly, without an undo burden on anybody they don't know boxing.
    This has nothing to do with boxing anymore, it's a question of science and economics.

    Which is why we're running into this debate: these guys know boxing, but they don't understand the science or the economics involved in their ramblings.

    For fuck's sake.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Ps3 problem
    By ono in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-27-2012, 07:46 PM
  2. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 09-15-2010, 03:12 PM
  3. Problem
    By Scrap in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 04:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing