Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,480
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3115
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Cleverly beating Bellow was an underrated victory.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    787
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Cleverly beating Bellow was an underrated victory.
    Agreed!
    And if it happens again tony would beat him I reckon

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    965
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Cleverly beating Bellow was an underrated victory.
    Agreed!
    And if it happens again tony would beat him I reckon
    In you dream's Tony is the second best Ligh-HW in the country, I like him let him win an other version
    of the Light- HW title, then have a rematch good pay day for each of them, a great fight for the fan's.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1423
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Warren's just trying to hype up his boy. Clev needs to step up his competition before challenging someone of Froch's calibre.

    Beating Clev does absolutely nothing for Froch's legacy, but it'll give him a good payday.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1423
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by mightyfighter View Post
    Warren's just trying to hype up his boy. Clev needs to step up his competition before challenging someone of Froch's calibre.

    Beating Clev does absolutely nothing for Froch's legacy, but it'll give him a good payday.
    You're not hyping him well by doing this though. Challenging a fighter out of your fighter's weightclass, and criticising his choise of higher calibre opponent for more money? It is idiocy. He did the same thing with Brook by challenging Khan.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    he has tried and failed with more than one of those fighters

    clev v froch would generate lots of pounds

    why not try?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Since the Bellew fight, which he arguably lost, Cleverly has fought Tommy Karpency and Shawn Hawk. Two of the WORST "world" title defenses of all-time.

    Clev is the one that needs to progress a bit.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1423
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    he has tried and failed with more than one of those fighters

    clev v froch would generate lots of pounds

    why not try?
    For Cleverly it would. Froch can make alot more money fighting Super-Middleweights.

    Also, he has only tried to secure a Hopkins fight. Again, it does nothing for Hopkins beating Cleverly because he hasn't proved a damn thing.

    Also, Boxrec has Bellew higher in the world rankings.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    and on clev v bellew, i am of the opinion it would be better when after bellew progresses a little bit more

    although if the fight happened now i would definately be watching
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    809
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    Bute.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Warren on Froch/ Calzaghe and Kessler...
    By THE PHILOSOPHER in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2012, 08:51 PM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-05-2012, 06:11 PM
  3. Froch talks Bute,Ward & why he wont fight Cleverly
    By porkypara in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-21-2012, 03:40 PM
  4. Froch vs Miranda/lacy or maybe cleverly?
    By Dropanuke in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 03:46 PM
  5. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 08:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing