I miss Tyson

[TysonBomb]

Your appeal to authority bullshit is exactly that ... BULLSHIT

I don't give a rats ass about Bert Sugar and his ramblings. Nor do I care about any Ring magazine list or any list from anyone because its all purely SUBJECTIVE

Everyone has biases, opinions, different criteria, beliefs etc. Each on one these lists DIFFER from another so your at straws by citing them.

The fact that you keep bringing these garbage lists up is incredibly foolish and childish.

I've exposed every single one of your posts and the inaccuracies and falsehoods that comprise their content.

Ah yes. Speaking of falsehoods, where is the evidence of Mike's soup hangover?



And where do you rank Tyson, for the fourth or fifth time.

A diet of nothing but soup and salad once a day in an attempt to get down to fighting weight and training only in front of the media is a recipe for disaster.

The way he was fighting it looked like he just expected to win by showing up. He was practically hungover.

Tyson is in the top 7 IMO ... can't put him near the very top because of how his career unfolded

[ross]

Your appeal to authority bullshit is exactly that ... BULLSHIT

I don't give a rats ass about Bert Sugar and his ramblings. Nor do I care about any Ring magazine list or any list from anyone because its all purely SUBJECTIVE

Everyone has biases, opinions, different criteria, beliefs etc. Each on one these lists DIFFER from another so your at straws by citing them.

The fact that you keep bringing these garbage lists up is incredibly foolish and childish.

I've exposed every single one of your posts and the inaccuracies and falsehoods that comprise their content.

Ah yes. Speaking of falsehoods, where is the evidence of Mike's soup hangover?



And where do you rank Tyson, for the fourth or fifth time.

Make a top ten list and be honest about who Mike actually couldnt really beat.

Ok, Lewis and Holyfield have wins over Mike but Mike also has a win over Holmes who was at a similar stage of his career as Mike was when he lost to Lewis and Holyfield. Just like when Mike fought Holmes, that wasnt the best version of Holmes and neither the steroid cheat Holyfield or Lewis fought the best version of Mike and neither came close to obliterating Mike the way Mike did to Larry. Holyfield in his prime struggled with an older version of Holmes.

By the time Holyfield fought Mike, Mike had an enforced 4 year absence and was a shell of the fighter he once was. He showed very little of the defensive skills, footwork or combinations that made him because he didnt have a trainer worth shit around him that wasnt just a yes man. When he fought Lewis hed had yet another enforced absence and was now just a name. As soon as King got Tyson he had no ambition for the actual fighting part of boxing.

The period Mike had when he was training right he did enough to warrant being n the top ten, certainly as much as Marciano did and more than Foreman. If Mike had died right after the Spinks fight the would be no revisionist history.

People dont rate Jones jrs career on what happened after Ruiz, or rather they choose to ignore it. I mever rated him that highly but in the ninties was Jones decade. Why does Mike get hammered for the shitty effort he put up after the Eighties?