Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Do you think Peterson v Khan 2 will ever happen ?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    697
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you think Peterson v Khan 2 will ever happen ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Too much risk. Gb will keep khan fighting undefeated lightweights.
    Uh ok. Seriously you think Khan would not relish the chance to get one of the belts back he bent over backwards to defend, in a guys own backyard, who then cheated and screwed him over for it? Khan maybe arrogant, idiotic and glass jawed but he is also ambitious, brave and capable of coming back from a seemingly career ending defeat. Fast hands, decent power, he is a decent light welter.
    You and others have got to quit claiming the cheat card my friend. He was under the acceptable amount of specific steroids for healing.That is in the rules. You are allowed through a doctor to use roids for rehab and that's what he did. As if he would ask for random tests if his intent was to cheat. Neither brother has any history of cheating. Given where Lamont came from and what he has achieved I just don't see it. The Wbc stripped him/ Big surprise there. The Ibf used science, logic and facts. Khan lost to Lamont because he fights like an idiot and not because Lamont was on Peds.
    Lamont cheated. Lamont Lied. There were rules in place Peterson flaunted them. Khan lost a close fight without using synthetic testosterone pellets, but Khan brought the belts to the table and followed the rules. If having the testosterone levels of a 70 year old man was a real honest and truthful assessment of Peterson's situation then what was he doing in a boxing ring, and why did he not mention this until after his test came back positive post fight? If he was not taking a banned substance then it would not have shown up in tests. Even if he gained no advantage by taking what is in effect a steroid he was still cheating.The IBF just lost even more credibility and risk sinking to the depths of the WBC. There is no science logic or facts that can excuse a sanctioning body for allowing a fighter to keep a belt that he won whilst failing a drug test even if that test was self imposed.

    That is simply wrong. Again, he tested under the allowable limit used for physical rehab and had he been using for purposes you claim he did then the amount in his system would have been ten times the amount found. The reason the Wbc stripped him is because they hate unification. The Ibf accepted the reasoning which was supported by doctors
    If you're going to use synthetic testosterone you need to decalre it and get a medical exemption certificate. He didn't do that and when the first sample tested positive he claimed he was clean and hadn't taken anything.

    “You have to declare it. It’s illegal to use it in many countries without a prescription,” explained Catlin. “If you have a legitimate prescription from a legitimate doctor for a lab-approved cause, it’s ok. But if you are an athlete you have to get a TUE (therapeutic use exemption) to make sure it is accurate because many, many athletes want to take it because it improves their sporting ability. And a lot take it and just say, ’Oh., I have low testosterone.’ That’s where this is the scurrilous part of all this. There are lots of doctors that do that.”

    Max Boxing - News - Dick Pound, Victor Conte and Don Catlin Speak on the Lamont Peterson Case
    This

    And how did he get "caught" anyway if his levels were in therapeutic range to treat testosterone deficiency??

    He should be stripped of the IBF title.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,155
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you think Peterson v Khan 2 will ever happen ?

    Quote Originally Posted by TysonBomb View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Too much risk. Gb will keep khan fighting undefeated lightweights.
    Uh ok. Seriously you think Khan would not relish the chance to get one of the belts back he bent over backwards to defend, in a guys own backyard, who then cheated and screwed him over for it? Khan maybe arrogant, idiotic and glass jawed but he is also ambitious, brave and capable of coming back from a seemingly career ending defeat. Fast hands, decent power, he is a decent light welter.
    You and others have got to quit claiming the cheat card my friend. He was under the acceptable amount of specific steroids for healing.That is in the rules. You are allowed through a doctor to use roids for rehab and that's what he did. As if he would ask for random tests if his intent was to cheat. Neither brother has any history of cheating. Given where Lamont came from and what he has achieved I just don't see it. The Wbc stripped him/ Big surprise there. The Ibf used science, logic and facts. Khan lost to Lamont because he fights like an idiot and not because Lamont was on Peds.
    Lamont cheated. Lamont Lied. There were rules in place Peterson flaunted them. Khan lost a close fight without using synthetic testosterone pellets, but Khan brought the belts to the table and followed the rules. If having the testosterone levels of a 70 year old man was a real honest and truthful assessment of Peterson's situation then what was he doing in a boxing ring, and why did he not mention this until after his test came back positive post fight? If he was not taking a banned substance then it would not have shown up in tests. Even if he gained no advantage by taking what is in effect a steroid he was still cheating.The IBF just lost even more credibility and risk sinking to the depths of the WBC. There is no science logic or facts that can excuse a sanctioning body for allowing a fighter to keep a belt that he won whilst failing a drug test even if that test was self imposed.

    That is simply wrong. Again, he tested under the allowable limit used for physical rehab and had he been using for purposes you claim he did then the amount in his system would have been ten times the amount found. The reason the Wbc stripped him is because they hate unification. The Ibf accepted the reasoning which was supported by doctors
    If you're going to use synthetic testosterone you need to decalre it and get a medical exemption certificate. He didn't do that and when the first sample tested positive he claimed he was clean and hadn't taken anything.

    “You have to declare it. It’s illegal to use it in many countries without a prescription,” explained Catlin. “If you have a legitimate prescription from a legitimate doctor for a lab-approved cause, it’s ok. But if you are an athlete you have to get a TUE (therapeutic use exemption) to make sure it is accurate because many, many athletes want to take it because it improves their sporting ability. And a lot take it and just say, ’Oh., I have low testosterone.’ That’s where this is the scurrilous part of all this. There are lots of doctors that do that.”

    Max Boxing - News - Dick Pound, Victor Conte and Don Catlin Speak on the Lamont Peterson Case
    This

    And how did he get "caught" anyway if his levels were in therapeutic range to treat testosterone deficiency??

    He should be stripped of the IBF title.
    See my next post.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Peterson vs Khan - Back On!
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-11-2012, 06:54 PM
  2. Khan vs Peterson, Ali vs lyle
    By Boxer4life in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-16-2011, 08:19 PM
  3. Who won the Khan vs. Peterson fight ?
    By Hulk in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 12-13-2011, 10:26 PM
  4. And new!? Khan vs Peterson .. afterthoughts
    By outspoken in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-11-2011, 11:39 AM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-09-2009, 04:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing