Chuck Wepner's knockdown of Muhammad Ali 1975

[THE PHILOSOPHER]

I don't think you quite grasp that my grammar doesn't need to be perfect to point out that resorting to critiquing a poster's grammar as a last resort because all of your other arguments have fallen flat, whilst possessing terrible grammar of your own is hypocritical?

I don't care if you weren't talking to me and I 'butted in'. This is an open forum and if your shit stinks then other posters can and will call you out on it.

Hypocrites and fanboy nuthuggers aren't liked on most message boards, this place is no different.

Actually i was emphasising how dumb he was after he suggested VK is comparable to Savarese and WK is a juicer! That was my argument cupcake not his grammar. Do u agree with his assertion? Yes or no? You must do as i disagree with him and my argument is based on both of those statements being utter bullcrap.

I pointed out 'Flawed' is not comparable to 'Floored' that was all...it was a way of emphasising what a fuckstick he is! (Note also that he never got back to me because he knows that non-title winning Savarese is not comparable to VK and that Wlad openly volunteered to WADA testing!) Are u his lover or summat?

You then got on your high horse with that pretentious conjunction crap and fucked your post up anyway! LOL. Oh and that 'Popster' thing it was a deliberate typo same with the 'U's etc

Well done for highlighting it and doing the exact same thing u r critiquing me for. Sucker. LOL only playing...

Simple really, i am just trying to establish your stance on the following as you call my argument weak:

-VK is an habitual steroid abuser?

-Wk is a juicer?

-Savarese is comparable to VK?

I disagree with all 3.