
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
I don't believe this is really all that true.
Although I do agree that different places breed different types of boxers.
Philly breed toughness as does South American countries, but I may be being stereotypical.
We seem to breed slick boxers, Nas, Calzaghe, Haye, Groves, Eubank, etc.
I'd much rather watch some of our "feather fisted" slick fighters than someone like Wilder.
I won't argue with you on British slickness, you do have a point. And, that slickness does cost the fight to go an extra round or two when faced with a devestating puncher. In fact, taking Floyd seriously out of the discussion, British boxers out-slick every other nationality fighter that I have seen. So, I will leave that there.
But, the same thing goes with French and Italian fighters, feather fisted. Canadian boxers have low output ratings. And Latin American fighters- except for Columbians- bleed profusefly and cut easily which causes most of their fights to end on cuts.
Today's African American fighter has no heart. They can take a punch every now and then, but to ask them to go 12 grueling rounds with someone that hits back is REALLY asking too much of them. But African fighters have all heart but little to no slickness and not the devestating punching ability that you THINK that they would have- black Africans and not Afrikans, which is a totally different breed of fighter and people.
Every area/continent has their own thing with their fighters.
Bookmarks