Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
There was a thread made about this and I decided to make a hypothetical scenario, which I think makes sense.

Say Vitali retires and Arreloa (#1 rank) gets the WBC title. Wlad beats him and takes it.

Now I believe that you should be made to defend your title once a year for each governing body.

Which means Wlad would have to have 4 fights per year.

All hypothetical but just how far from reality is this? Should you be made to defend your title at the very least, yearly?

Or does money play a part? Is that why fighters like Wlad can just pick people like Pianata for an easy win and payday?
If you hold more than one title (and one of them is the WBA), the WBA makes you 'Super' Champion, which means you're only required to meet your mandatory every 18 months. I'm ashamed that I know this.