Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 55

Thread: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    i'm excited for the peterson matthysse fight.
    It's a good match up. Who gives a fuck if there worthless titles are not on the line?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,900
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    903
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    i'm excited for the peterson matthysse fight.
    It's a good match up. Who gives a fuck if there worthless titles are not on the line?

    yup!!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,783
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. I have mine. Catchweights cheapen the significance of weight divisions. Why have them? Do away with them altogether and just have fighters meet at prearranged weights. A professional fighter is perfectly capable of making the weight given sufficient time and preparation. That's what training camps are for. A gap of 7 pounds between divisions isn't a world of difference... it's not like the divisions are 20 pounds apart. They're doing it more now, or at least it's being publicized more now than in the past... and that's all there is to it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    998
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Everyone's entitled to their opinion. I have mine. Catchweights cheapen the significance of weight divisions. Why have them? Do away with them altogether and just have fighters meet at prearranged weights. A professional fighter is perfectly capable of making the weight given sufficient time and preparation. That's what training camps are for. A gap of 7 pounds between divisions isn't a world of difference... it's not like the divisions are 20 pounds apart. They're doing it more now, or at least it's being publicized more now than in the past... and that's all there is to it.

    Lol exactly. Just get rid of all the bullshit paper titles and those paper tigers that covet them.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    998
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Lets make a light jr welter class say 138

    A bare minimum class of 100

    Lets at least try to "catch" up with the number of titles.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Lets make a light jr welter class say 138

    A bare minimum class of 100

    Lets at least try to "catch" up with the number of titles.
    You don't need a weight-class and certainly do NOT need a title to make a good/fair fight.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    998
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    How about a wafer thin category. That way the anorexics can join in.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    How about a wafer thin category. That way the anorexics can join in.
    As a boxing fan, you'd rather see fighters at a weight that gives one an advantage, as long as there's a "title" involved, instead of a genuine 50/50 no excuses needed match-up? Seriously?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,783
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    What has changed that having weight divisions suddenly isn't good enough? Should we just do away with them altogether? Do away with titles? What would fighters be striving for? The 138-pound championship belt? What has changed between "before" and "now"? What are we to do with the past? So now the past weight division championships are meaningless? All because of the silly catchweights?

    What a load of CRAP.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,078
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5123
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Catchweights are becoming an easy copout.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    How about a wafer thin category. That way the anorexics can join in.
    As a boxing fan, you'd rather see fighters at a weight that gives one an advantage, as long as there's a "title" involved, instead of a genuine 50/50 no excuses needed match-up? Seriously?
    Dunno man. Sounds a little like political correctness runamok So how about the mindset and practice of guys already agreeing to limits and then packing on 10-20 lbs overnight. Do you seriously think that would stop because a guy is 'comfortable'? Where do you draw the line. Every human looks for an advantage. Sometimes its called being the better boxer. If your not comfy, move up.

    If you sign the contract the excuses are null and void. Problem with this 'catchweight' fight in particular is it has zero to do with weight, its a political maneuver. Fighters don't want to lose the payday and Pederson wants to keep his glorified paperweight...for more paydays...after he gets sparked.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-03-2009, 09:48 PM
  2. Still too easy IMO
    By kingfrnk in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-29-2009, 07:52 AM
  3. Mundine does it easy
    By Big Jack in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-04-2007, 08:10 AM
  4. No easy meal here !
    By Lords Gym in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 05:48 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-01-2006, 08:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing