Re: I LIKE Tyson Fury- but Arreola, Jennings and/or Wilder STARCHES HIM!

Originally Posted by
ross
Lets be fair.
Although Fury has faced good competition it wasnt great. Cunningham may be a small heavyweight but he is a heavyweight none the less and he is tough, never stopped and should have got the decision against Adamek.
Cunningham is probably the most capable, world class fighter that Fury has faced and he went in there full of himself and almost dismissed Cunningham because of his size. He has learnt a lesson that any fight from now on he cant afford to fuck around. He still did a job. These are the sorts of things we should be saying about Price, that he got up, regrouped and came back to win by KO but Price doesnt have Furys toughness or desire. Prices opponent came in in apalling shape and still did that. Cunningham came in great shape and off arguably his best career showing.
My point is, I think Fury underestimated Cunningham because he wasnt perceived as a puncher (although as someone pointed out earlier, he has something like a 50% KO ratio but given that hes been facing world class fighters from about his 15th fight that isnt bad) and the size advantage. You cant blame Fury for being too big, this is the heavyweight division and Mike Tyson fought and won with bigger heaight differences than this one.
Just look at how differently he fought Johnson. He saw Johnson as a bigger threat than Cunningham. He will improve on this.
You're a retard.
Price was up against one of the top Heavyweights, a genuine HW with genuine power, Tompson has more KOs than fury has fights.
And you wanna compare those two fights?
When Fury ejaculates do you spit or swallow?
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
Bookmarks