Oh we are back to me just being a dumb sheep of a Soldier that couldn't do anything else are we? When in doubt Ad Hominem right? I don't have any agenda here. I don't really care what you and others think about the US and of course my children are my primary concern. What a silly statement to make.

Nuremberg gets you close but really is just more of a declarative statement about aggression and lets face it was very much a winners getting to write history moment. Article 39 of the UN Charter provides that the UN Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and "shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security". But again that isn't a definition of legal vs illegal only stating that the UN can vote on an act and how to bring peace back. I think even you can agree that if the US gets a vote then the whole concept of legality is a sham.

What you are really looking for is the Rome Statutes that actually have an international criminal court that rules on aggression with codified law but it only has jurisdiciton over state parties and the US is not one.

See Miles I wasn't just being obtuse there was an actual answer to the question you just didn't know it. Thankfully despite being a full blown retard that should be lucky there is a military to employ me I somehow figured it out. Must have been that lousy American education I got.