Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35

Thread: Who next for burns?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    949
    Cool Clicks

    Question Re: Who next for burns?

    To the knockers of Ricky Burn's what more can he DO,! but only win and he has some people
    are never happy. Burn's is a descent nice guy, and he can fight never here him bad mouth trash
    talking BS, coming out of his mouth.
    What he is a roll model for BOXING, we need more Ricky's in this sport not like a lot of the loud
    mouth shit bags we have in the sport.
    We can pick hole's in all fighters records, can't we he never face him he beat him when he was on
    the slide etc,! remember you CAN only beat who is in-front of you.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,412
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    its very hard to find him a good fight. Going by how poor he was tonight they are not gonna want let him near Broner, Abril or Shafikov. So I guess that only leaves Vasquez at lightweight for him.

    Bogere could be a fight for him. Im suyre hed come to Scotland and would be a decent fight.
    I think burns would beat shafikov, fairly easily too, not much point fighting him just now though.. I think burns should pick some good match ups that will allow him to chase broner and then hopefully get a big money fight v broner and cash out :S..... he will make a lot of money from a broner fight and no use hiding from him even though he will probably lose..

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    719
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Burns will never face Broner or Vazquez now. He was getting dominated by a fringe prospect. He's lucky Gonzalez is a boricua. Cuz if he wasn't Burns is no longer champion
    Broners moved up, and burns beats Vazquez.

    Remember they had 0 footage of Gonzales. He had a big reach and used it well.
    There was 2 videos of him on YouTube before the fight. They should have known what to expect

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    It never ceases to amaze me just how fast people are thrown under the bus. So he had a rough night so what? He had a rocky 8 months having fights canceled and a switch in promoters. He probably took this guy as lightly as we did never mind the style. He still persevered and showed amazing heart. Champions have bad nights. Its part of the sport. I'm sure at the time that Paul Pender had no business being in the ring with Robinson let alone beating him twice.

    Burns just needs to keep on the same road map. He's got an optional now and he might want to use it or go for Abril or Vazquez. I don't see Broner coming back to 135 and he was all wrong for Ricky before Saturday and still is.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    I guess people forget vasquez barely squeeked by his last oppponent
    He actually embarrassed Gesta pretty easily
    As I said my bad it wasn't gesta but the dude before it, he'd lietrally barely scrapped by some no name
    And Gonzalez was a big name? He was a fringe prospect. Lucky for Burns he was a fringe prospect with no heart. Vazquez is troubled by fighters who are stronger than him and have good power. That's not Burns

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1176
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    I guess people forget vasquez barely squeeked by his last oppponent
    He actually embarrassed Gesta pretty easily
    As I said my bad it wasn't gesta but the dude before it, he'd lietrally barely scrapped by some no name
    And Gonzalez was a big name? He was a fringe prospect. Lucky for Burns he was a fringe prospect with no heart. Vazquez is troubled by fighters who are stronger than him and have good power. That's not Burns
    I didn't say gonzalez was a big name just that vasquez didn't look good against some no namer just as burns did last night

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armin View Post
    I guess people forget vasquez barely squeeked by his last oppponent
    He actually embarrassed Gesta pretty easily
    As I said my bad it wasn't gesta but the dude before it, he'd lietrally barely scrapped by some no name
    And Gonzalez was a big name? He was a fringe prospect. Lucky for Burns he was a fringe prospect with no heart. Vazquez is troubled by fighters who are stronger than him and have good power. That's not Burns
    I didn't say gonzalez was a big name just that vasquez didn't look good against some no namer just as burns did last night
    Don't let the bad judging fool you. While the fight was competitive there was no way Quintero won that. That should of been a UD win. Not an SD win

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    719
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    It never ceases to amaze me just how fast people are thrown under the bus. So he had a rough night so what? He had a rocky 8 months having fights canceled and a switch in promoters. He probably took this guy as lightly as we did never mind the style. He still persevered and showed amazing heart. Champions have bad nights. Its part of the sport. I'm sure at the time that Paul Pender had no business being in the ring with Robinson let alone beating him twice.

    Burns just needs to keep on the same road map. He's got an optional now and he might want to use it or go for Abril or Vazquez. I don't see Broner coming back to 135 and he was all wrong for Ricky before Saturday and still is.
    THey are thrown under a bus just as quick as they are put on a high horse. Seriously, people talk about Ricky like he was world class and giving him a chance against Broner. He has one name on his record, Martinez, where he fought well but struggled. He then looked good against average fighters. He was over hyped and this is what happens to overhyped fighters.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    It never ceases to amaze me just how fast people are thrown under the bus. So he had a rough night so what? He had a rocky 8 months having fights canceled and a switch in promoters. He probably took this guy as lightly as we did never mind the style. He still persevered and showed amazing heart. Champions have bad nights. Its part of the sport. I'm sure at the time that Paul Pender had no business being in the ring with Robinson let alone beating him twice.

    Burns just needs to keep on the same road map. He's got an optional now and he might want to use it or go for Abril or Vazquez. I don't see Broner coming back to 135 and he was all wrong for Ricky before Saturday and still is.
    THey are thrown under a bus just as quick as they are put on a high horse. Seriously, people talk about Ricky like he was world class and giving him a chance against Broner. He has one name on his record, Martinez, where he fought well but struggled. He then looked good against average fighters. He was over hyped and this is what happens to overhyped fighters.
    No offense but that's pretzel logic. When someone lost in eras gone by it was no big deal and when someone had a bad night it was no big deal either. You name me a great and I 'll tell you about a bad night he had. Tendler boxed Leonards ears off the first time they met. So? And tell me about all these other world class fighters that are not Ricky Burns. He's a world class fighter period! or he would not be where he is today. If he's a paper tiger then so are most of the other trinket holders. I reject the notion that unless you dominate all the time without issue you are not world class. Thats simply a crock of shit.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    719
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    It never ceases to amaze me just how fast people are thrown under the bus. So he had a rough night so what? He had a rocky 8 months having fights canceled and a switch in promoters. He probably took this guy as lightly as we did never mind the style. He still persevered and showed amazing heart. Champions have bad nights. Its part of the sport. I'm sure at the time that Paul Pender had no business being in the ring with Robinson let alone beating him twice.

    Burns just needs to keep on the same road map. He's got an optional now and he might want to use it or go for Abril or Vazquez. I don't see Broner coming back to 135 and he was all wrong for Ricky before Saturday and still is.
    THey are thrown under a bus just as quick as they are put on a high horse. Seriously, people talk about Ricky like he was world class and giving him a chance against Broner. He has one name on his record, Martinez, where he fought well but struggled. He then looked good against average fighters. He was over hyped and this is what happens to overhyped fighters.
    No offense but that's pretzel logic. When someone lost in eras gone by it was no big deal and when someone had a bad night it was no big deal either. You name me a great and I 'll tell you about a bad night he had. Tendler boxed Leonards ears off the first time they met. So? And tell me about all these other world class fighters that are not Ricky Burns. He's a world class fighter period! or he would not be where he is today. If he's a paper tiger then so are most of the other trinket holders. I reject the notion that unless you dominate all the time without issue you are not world class. Thats simply a crock of shit.
    You are not world class until you beat world class boxers. Unfortunately Ricky has not. He was blown out of proportion far too quickly.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    It never ceases to amaze me just how fast people are thrown under the bus. So he had a rough night so what? He had a rocky 8 months having fights canceled and a switch in promoters. He probably took this guy as lightly as we did never mind the style. He still persevered and showed amazing heart. Champions have bad nights. Its part of the sport. I'm sure at the time that Paul Pender had no business being in the ring with Robinson let alone beating him twice.

    Burns just needs to keep on the same road map. He's got an optional now and he might want to use it or go for Abril or Vazquez. I don't see Broner coming back to 135 and he was all wrong for Ricky before Saturday and still is.
    THey are thrown under a bus just as quick as they are put on a high horse. Seriously, people talk about Ricky like he was world class and giving him a chance against Broner. He has one name on his record, Martinez, where he fought well but struggled. He then looked good against average fighters. He was over hyped and this is what happens to overhyped fighters.
    No offense but that's pretzel logic. When someone lost in eras gone by it was no big deal and when someone had a bad night it was no big deal either. You name me a great and I 'll tell you about a bad night he had. Tendler boxed Leonards ears off the first time they met. So? And tell me about all these other world class fighters that are not Ricky Burns. He's a world class fighter period! or he would not be where he is today. If he's a paper tiger then so are most of the other trinket holders. I reject the notion that unless you dominate all the time without issue you are not world class. Thats simply a crock of shit.
    We not in those eras no more. Different times. Different perceptions. Things are looked at differently. I agree with you that a fighter doesn't have to dominate all the time. And bad nights do happen. But he's right on Burns. He''s a title holder. But he's no where close to being a very good fighter. He's mediocre at best. Forget the Gonzalez fight. Bad night or not good fighters don't lose to Alex Arthur. They just don't

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    It never ceases to amaze me just how fast people are thrown under the bus. So he had a rough night so what? He had a rocky 8 months having fights canceled and a switch in promoters. He probably took this guy as lightly as we did never mind the style. He still persevered and showed amazing heart. Champions have bad nights. Its part of the sport. I'm sure at the time that Paul Pender had no business being in the ring with Robinson let alone beating him twice.

    Burns just needs to keep on the same road map. He's got an optional now and he might want to use it or go for Abril or Vazquez. I don't see Broner coming back to 135 and he was all wrong for Ricky before Saturday and still is.
    THey are thrown under a bus just as quick as they are put on a high horse. Seriously, people talk about Ricky like he was world class and giving him a chance against Broner. He has one name on his record, Martinez, where he fought well but struggled. He then looked good against average fighters. He was over hyped and this is what happens to overhyped fighters.
    No offense but that's pretzel logic. When someone lost in eras gone by it was no big deal and when someone had a bad night it was no big deal either. You name me a great and I 'll tell you about a bad night he had. Tendler boxed Leonards ears off the first time they met. So? And tell me about all these other world class fighters that are not Ricky Burns. He's a world class fighter period! or he would not be where he is today. If he's a paper tiger then so are most of the other trinket holders. I reject the notion that unless you dominate all the time without issue you are not world class. Thats simply a crock of shit.
    We not in those eras no more. Different times. Different perceptions. Things are looked at differently. I agree with you that a fighter doesn't have to dominate all the time. And bad nights do happen. But he's right on Burns. He''s a title holder. But he's no where close to being a very good fighter. He's mediocre at best. Forget the Gonzalez fight. Bad night or not good fighters don't lose to Alex Arthur. They just don't
    Wait a minute. The Arthur fight was 7 years ago. Boxing is littered with fighters that lose at a low level before winning in higher class. Why? Because many IMPROVE. The novice Burns that lost to Arthur wouldn't have beat Martinez, Katsidis, Moses, Gonzales, Mitchell, Gomez etc.

    Burns is no way close to being an P4P fighter. However, he's a proven very good fighter in a weak division.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    It never ceases to amaze me just how fast people are thrown under the bus. So he had a rough night so what? He had a rocky 8 months having fights canceled and a switch in promoters. He probably took this guy as lightly as we did never mind the style. He still persevered and showed amazing heart. Champions have bad nights. Its part of the sport. I'm sure at the time that Paul Pender had no business being in the ring with Robinson let alone beating him twice.

    Burns just needs to keep on the same road map. He's got an optional now and he might want to use it or go for Abril or Vazquez. I don't see Broner coming back to 135 and he was all wrong for Ricky before Saturday and still is.
    THey are thrown under a bus just as quick as they are put on a high horse. Seriously, people talk about Ricky like he was world class and giving him a chance against Broner. He has one name on his record, Martinez, where he fought well but struggled. He then looked good against average fighters. He was over hyped and this is what happens to overhyped fighters.
    No offense but that's pretzel logic. When someone lost in eras gone by it was no big deal and when someone had a bad night it was no big deal either. You name me a great and I 'll tell you about a bad night he had. Tendler boxed Leonards ears off the first time they met. So? And tell me about all these other world class fighters that are not Ricky Burns. He's a world class fighter period! or he would not be where he is today. If he's a paper tiger then so are most of the other trinket holders. I reject the notion that unless you dominate all the time without issue you are not world class. Thats simply a crock of shit.
    We not in those eras no more. Different times. Different perceptions. Things are looked at differently. I agree with you that a fighter doesn't have to dominate all the time. And bad nights do happen. But he's right on Burns. He''s a title holder. But he's no where close to being a very good fighter. He's mediocre at best. Forget the Gonzalez fight. Bad night or not good fighters don't lose to Alex Arthur. They just don't
    So what. It makes little difference what era it is. This is boxing not tiddly winks and on any given night you can look bad or get beaten by a lesser opponent. Upsets happen. Its part of the sport and has been since they came off the grappling mat. The fact of the matter is it says a lot about boxing fans that they would just chuck a guy to the curb after years of hard work because he had a bad night. Many many champions and many in the hall of fame have had worse nights then Ricky did and against lessor opponents. How did Chavez lose to Randall? The only guy Randall fought prior to Sr was a washed up shot Rosario.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1306
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    I know his style is loathed by many, and probably for good reason if I'm honest, but I think Vasquez might just be the best lightweight out there. I think he boxes Burns' head off when they meet. Credit to Burns if they unify with Vasquez next. If he were able to beat Vasquez, I would give him a lot of credit.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,189
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3097
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who next for burns?

    Burns was lucky in his last fight, he needs to have a rematch.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-12-2013, 08:10 PM
  2. Well done Ricky burns!!!!
    By rosco1984 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-26-2012, 06:52 PM
  3. Burns Night
    By Dia bando in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-24-2012, 06:27 PM
  4. Ricky burns
    By Glinchdogg in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-03-2012, 10:54 AM
  5. Ricky Burns
    By DOC_YKF_1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-03-2006, 12:14 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing