Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 128

Thread: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,012
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    722
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Tbh I'm having a little bit of an issue with this one. The 141 crap kind of turned me off. No title on the line it would seem because Lucas is worried about his ranking with the Wbc should he have won the Ibf title. The whole thing stinks really.

    I'll ride with Lamont.
    I've read into it and it was one of the sanctioning bodies that didn't want to have a joint title fight so they had to make it non-title. Wasn't really the fighters fault and one pound for either one is irrelevant.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1007
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

    Quote Originally Posted by DavilaJones View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Tbh I'm having a little bit of an issue with this one. The 141 crap kind of turned me off. No title on the line it would seem because Lucas is worried about his ranking with the Wbc should he have won the Ibf title. The whole thing stinks really.

    I'll ride with Lamont.
    I've read into it and it was one of the sanctioning bodies that didn't want to have a joint title fight so they had to make it non-title. Wasn't really the fighters fault and one pound for either one is irrelevant.
    Its all because of Jose and the WBC. They are against unification. Remember before the Trout/Alvarez fight he said the winner would have 15 days to decide which title he was going to keep.
    Its not the first time he's pulled this shit. Of course apparently that rule only applied to Trout because Alvarez has not been forced to decide.

    At any rate Lucas is a c-hair away from being the next challenger for the Wbc and if he would have paid his sanctioning fees to the IBF and then went on to beat Lamont he would have lost that ranking.
    I guess he prefers the green and gold. Its still a great fight but I just don't get off on the politics

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,160
    Mentioned
    439 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5134
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DavilaJones View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Tbh I'm having a little bit of an issue with this one. The 141 crap kind of turned me off. No title on the line it would seem because Lucas is worried about his ranking with the Wbc should he have won the Ibf title. The whole thing stinks really.

    I'll ride with Lamont.
    I've read into it and it was one of the sanctioning bodies that didn't want to have a joint title fight so they had to make it non-title. Wasn't really the fighters fault and one pound for either one is irrelevant.
    Its all because of Jose and the WBC. They are against unification. Remember before the Trout/Alvarez fight he said the winner would have 15 days to decide which title he was going to keep.
    Its not the first time he's pulled this shit. Of course apparently that rule only applied to Trout because Alvarez has not been forced to decide.

    At any rate Lucas is a c-hair away from being the next challenger for the Wbc and if he would have paid his sanctioning fees to the IBF and then went on to beat Lamont he would have lost that ranking.
    I guess he prefers the green and gold. Its still a great fight but I just don't get off on the politics
    I'm with ya on something smelling bad. I don't care about the trinket but the maneuvering and wink and nod with El heffe Sullied'man and politics is pure manipulation and parlor tricks. Its not a catchweight match...its a good match with a default insurance policy. And yes, winning and losing need to mean something. If you lose, you lose a ranking simple as. If either think they stroll into a immediate title fight if hypothetically they get blown out and owned they already have one knee down in that slugs direction. Jose has def screwed more fighters than he has actual women. If they do keep ranking and guarenteed mega payday for a trinket next up and fans don't call bullshit on it..shame on the fans. As far as the fight I'm with Matthysse big time. Better boxer than credited for and eventually Peterson will square up and hook off his hips when he gets buzzed...and he will be buzzed. He isn't slugging with Khan here. Whole different animal in Matthysse.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wroclaw
    Posts
    1,379
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1126
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

    I just hope Mathysse doesn't get screwed by the judges again. Or Lamont. Let's see a good fight.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,514
    Mentioned
    1699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3118
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

    Is the fight on over here?
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1874
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,514
    Mentioned
    1699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3118
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

    I genuinely believe Garcia has been avoiding Matthysse and I think Khan would try to avoid him too once he beats Peterson and Garcia.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    736
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Is the fight on over here?
    On sky

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1323
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saturday on Shwtime--Matheyse VS Petersen

    Is anyone else skeptical that Lamont Peterson is on drugs for this fight? There was supposed to be 24/7 drug testing and for some unknown reason there wasn't. Peterson has failed drug tests before. Frankly, it sounds like Matthysse is an idiot. He has a shot at a big-money fight with Garcia if he wins, and he doesn't enforce drug testing against Peterson, who is a known cheat?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Anyone going to Pac v. JMM on Saturday?
    By Big-mike13 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-08-2011, 04:31 AM
  2. 24/7 on Saturday night?
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2009, 03:47 PM
  3. Lennox did something different on Saturday.
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-16-2008, 02:07 PM
  4. i met an ATG on saturday night !!!!
    By hitmanhatton in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-30-2008, 08:04 AM
  5. Which is the Better PPV Saturday
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-15-2008, 02:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing