Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Kirkland STILL has yet to answer where the President was, not that he cares because he's not American....but hey Obama wants to sick the IRS on Conservative groups that's fine by Kirkland, Obama wants to sweep Benghazi under the rug to get reelected that's fine by Kirkland, Obama wants to illegally (oooh did I say that?) seize phone records of the AP, wants to name James Rosen as a "co-conspirator" so they can illegally (oh there's that word again) access Rosen's private emails...that's fine by Kirkland.


The only thing that's not fine by Kirkland, Presidents named Bush or that have an R beside their name. Why is that? Well that's because Kirkland is your stereotypical dirtbag liberal who doesn't give a shit about rules and regulations until it helps his agenda.



That a decent enough counter argument you contrarian dope?
Do you want me to dig up the Julian Assange threads to see which of us is consistent on journalists leaking classified information and which of us is motivated by politics and ideology?

As far as the IRS goes did you see me mention it when the Bush IRS people were going after various liberal/lefty groups like the NAACP? The Benghazi thing is just pathetic. Once you get past the nutjob theories all you're left with is arguing over a fucking talking points memo and whether calling something a terrorist act is the same as calling it an act of terrorism.

It's difficult running a plutocracy while pretending to be a democratic leader who respects the rule of law. Eventually the conflicts burst out into the open in every presidency.