This is a great argument for instant replay.
This is a great argument for instant replay.
We tried this at Martinez vs. Murray, but when Murray knocked Martinez down for the 2nd time in Argentina, after viewing instant replay between rounds, it was still ruled a slip. They will manipulate anything for a desired outcome. We need an impartial body to sort this crap out because the rules of boxing couldn't be more blurred right now.
From what you are described about Broner’s indiscretions it seems the ref should have penalised Broner for it so he should be held accountable. We do not need rule upon rules, we just need them to be implemented.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Boxing refs and judges I'm sure are all huge fans of the sport but first and foremost they're there to pick up a regular paycheck. The guys judging and reffing the undercards want to become main event officials one day so if you see an overmatched prospect get the benefit of a robbery decision you know the judges are thinking about their future in the sport. If the ref somehow doesn't manage to spot a house fighter trying to kick somebody in the balls you can be certain he won't miss somebody trying to kick the house fighter.
So it doesn't matter what set of unified rules you have, you still have to get past the fact that boxing is a business and the people boxing employs to do various officiating jobs are trying to either move up the food chain or maintain their place at the top of it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks