You meant fighter a winning 2:45 of a round then fighter b scoring a KD in second scenario? I think this is why a 10 point must system is flawed and encourages math tricks. If a guy goes down regardless of what came prior, he should lose a point, no maneuvering numbers etc. In Holyfield v Moorer for example it was scored a 10-10. It's just as simple as losing a point. A ruled power KD should be more costly than being out jabbed. If you lose a point on a foul you LOSE it, etc etc.
First question is a 2 point knockdown score but 1 point penality for a foul! One point advantage!
The second question is a difficult one without viewing the senerio! Your granted the 2 point advantage from a knockdown but if your lossing the round big it could be a 1 point up or even round!
If even you need to look hard for an advantage from one or the other. Even rounds should be a rareity and theres usually a winner if you look hard enough!
Also consider the effect of the knockdown was it a flash or a meanigfull drop? Ray.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks