I always want Froch to lose. Can't see Groves beating him though.
Why your dislike for froch?
Ever since he was calling out Calzaghe. When he eventually got the opportunity to fight him he bottled it and then still kept saying Calzaghe was dodging him afterwards. He still does it now occasionally. Mainly that.
I actually admire what he does in the ring. You've got to hand it to him, what he does he does amazingly well. But then he gets out of the ring and opens his mouth and I go back to not liking him again.
Froch would have a difficult time outboxing calzaghe.
I always want Froch to lose. Can't see Groves beating him though.
Why your dislike for froch?
Ever since he was calling out Calzaghe. When he eventually got the opportunity to fight him he bottled it and then still kept saying Calzaghe was dodging him afterwards. He still does it now occasionally. Mainly that.
I actually admire what he does in the ring. You've got to hand it to him, what he does he does amazingly well. But then he gets out of the ring and opens his mouth and I go back to not liking him again.
Froch would have a difficult time outboxing calzaghe.
I always want Froch to lose. Can't see Groves beating him though.
Why your dislike for froch?
Ever since he was calling out Calzaghe. When he eventually got the opportunity to fight him he bottled it and then still kept saying Calzaghe was dodging him afterwards. He still does it now occasionally. Mainly that.
I actually admire what he does in the ring. You've got to hand it to him, what he does he does amazingly well. But then he gets out of the ring and opens his mouth and I go back to not liking him again.
Froch would have a difficult time outboxing calzaghe.
Definitely. Inside the ring I like Froch, can't fault the guy. Outside, not so much. I'll miss him when he's gone though, until he turns up as a pundit and annoys me again.
Bookmarks