Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: Why was Tito so obsessed with Roy and not with Oscar ????

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why was Tito so obsessed with Roy and not with Oscar ????

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I thought ODH deserved the decisions against Pernell and Ike.
    He did.

    Mostly folks argue about the Pernell fight.
    De La Hoya won that on effective aggression. Pernell lost on inaction and not throwing enough back.
    If you're gonna make a man miss, you're also supposed to make him pay by giving him a counter.
    Pernell didn't do that. Pernell would make him miss and walk away, not make him miss and make him pay. He didn't counter. Pernell would showboat a bit after making De La Hoya miss like an amateur, trying to give the impression that Pernell was in control of the fight, but Pernell wasn't throwing counter-shots after making him miss, Pernell clowned around instead. That doesn't win fights. I give it to the guy who's at least throwing punches, trying to win the fight.

    De la Hoya kept coming ahead with aggression, at least throwing shots with bad intentions, while Pernell kept on the backfoot, making him miss but not taking advantage with counters. In that moment, I'm gonna give it to the fighter who's at least coming ahead trying to make a fight out of it, not the dude shucking and jiving, not engaging and not throwing counters after making the man miss....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why was Tito so obsessed with Roy and not with Oscar ????

    Oscar won with aggression Whitaker was not throwing anything you got to hit to score points. As for the Ike fight the last round sealed it for Oscar that knockdown was needed and he got it. Atleast in those fights you can make argument i still to this day can not see Tito winning on points in their fight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    600
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I thought ODH deserved the decisions against Pernell and Ike.
    He did.

    Mostly folks argue about the Pernell fight.
    De La Hoya won that on effective aggression. Pernell lost on inaction and not throwing enough back.
    If you're gonna make a man miss, you're also supposed to make him pay by giving him a counter.
    Pernell didn't do that. Pernell would make him miss and walk away, not make him miss and make him pay. He didn't counter. Pernell would showboat a bit after making De La Hoya miss like an amateur, trying to give the impression that Pernell was in control of the fight, but Pernell wasn't throwing counter-shots after making him miss, Pernell clowned around instead. That doesn't win fights. I give it to the guy who's at least throwing punches, trying to win the fight.

    De la Hoya kept coming ahead with aggression, at least throwing shots with bad intentions, while Pernell kept on the backfoot, making him miss but not taking advantage with counters. In that moment, I'm gonna give it to the fighter who's at least coming ahead trying to make a fight out of it, not the dude shucking and jiving, not engaging and not throwing counters after making the man miss....

    He landed 90 more punches, how much countering do you want

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why was Tito so obsessed with Roy and not with Oscar ????

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Rice View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I thought ODH deserved the decisions against Pernell and Ike.
    He did.

    Mostly folks argue about the Pernell fight.
    De La Hoya won that on effective aggression. Pernell lost on inaction and not throwing enough back.
    If you're gonna make a man miss, you're also supposed to make him pay by giving him a counter.
    Pernell didn't do that. Pernell would make him miss and walk away, not make him miss and make him pay. He didn't counter. Pernell would showboat a bit after making De La Hoya miss like an amateur, trying to give the impression that Pernell was in control of the fight, but Pernell wasn't throwing counter-shots after making him miss, Pernell clowned around instead. That doesn't win fights. I give it to the guy who's at least throwing punches, trying to win the fight.

    De la Hoya kept coming ahead with aggression, at least throwing shots with bad intentions, while Pernell kept on the backfoot, making him miss but not taking advantage with counters. In that moment, I'm gonna give it to the fighter who's at least coming ahead trying to make a fight out of it, not the dude shucking and jiving, not engaging and not throwing counters after making the man miss....

    He landed 90 more punches, how much countering do you want
    No he did not. It was only 41 more. And most of Whitaker's landed punches was that flicking, ineffective, stay away from me jab. That bullshit knock down he got credit for wasn't even from a punch. Whitaker gave A level defensive performance. But only a D level offensive performance. He did not win that fight

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    600
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Rice View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I thought ODH deserved the decisions against Pernell and Ike.
    He did.

    Mostly folks argue about the Pernell fight.
    De La Hoya won that on effective aggression. Pernell lost on inaction and not throwing enough back.
    If you're gonna make a man miss, you're also supposed to make him pay by giving him a counter.
    Pernell didn't do that. Pernell would make him miss and walk away, not make him miss and make him pay. He didn't counter. Pernell would showboat a bit after making De La Hoya miss like an amateur, trying to give the impression that Pernell was in control of the fight, but Pernell wasn't throwing counter-shots after making him miss, Pernell clowned around instead. That doesn't win fights. I give it to the guy who's at least throwing punches, trying to win the fight.

    De la Hoya kept coming ahead with aggression, at least throwing shots with bad intentions, while Pernell kept on the backfoot, making him miss but not taking advantage with counters. In that moment, I'm gonna give it to the fighter who's at least coming ahead trying to make a fight out of it, not the dude shucking and jiving, not engaging and not throwing counters after making the man miss....

    He landed 90 more punches, how much countering do you want
    No he did not. It was only 41 more. And most of Whitaker's landed punches was that flicking, ineffective, stay away from me jab. That bullshit knock down he got credit for wasn't even from a punch. Whitaker gave A level defensive performance. But only a D level offensive performance. He did not win that fight

    I know that you are fair when you want to be, at least admit the scorecards were bullshit.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why was Tito so obsessed with Roy and not with Oscar ????

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Rice View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Rice View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    I thought ODH deserved the decisions against Pernell and Ike.
    He did.

    Mostly folks argue about the Pernell fight.
    De La Hoya won that on effective aggression. Pernell lost on inaction and not throwing enough back.
    If you're gonna make a man miss, you're also supposed to make him pay by giving him a counter.
    Pernell didn't do that. Pernell would make him miss and walk away, not make him miss and make him pay. He didn't counter. Pernell would showboat a bit after making De La Hoya miss like an amateur, trying to give the impression that Pernell was in control of the fight, but Pernell wasn't throwing counter-shots after making him miss, Pernell clowned around instead. That doesn't win fights. I give it to the guy who's at least throwing punches, trying to win the fight.

    De la Hoya kept coming ahead with aggression, at least throwing shots with bad intentions, while Pernell kept on the backfoot, making him miss but not taking advantage with counters. In that moment, I'm gonna give it to the fighter who's at least coming ahead trying to make a fight out of it, not the dude shucking and jiving, not engaging and not throwing counters after making the man miss....

    He landed 90 more punches, how much countering do you want
    No he did not. It was only 41 more. And most of Whitaker's landed punches was that flicking, ineffective, stay away from me jab. That bullshit knock down he got credit for wasn't even from a punch. Whitaker gave A level defensive performance. But only a D level offensive performance. He did not win that fight

    I know that you are fair when you want to be, at least admit the scorecards were bullshit.
    They were. Way to wide. But the right guy won

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. PRICELESS!!! Tito open for Oscar rematch!
    By Wacko3205 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 05-09-2007, 08:41 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-05-2007, 08:21 PM
  3. Oscar is saying that tito demands 80/20 split
    By frozensolid_702 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-22-2006, 04:13 PM
  4. Tito-Oscar fight that's updated
    By Mintymen in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2006, 07:39 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-09-2006, 07:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing