Would a prime Ricky Hatton beaten Broner.

[FinitoElDinamita]

On neutral territory, not a snowball's chance in hell. Hatton was a lower B level fighter.. He dont have a chance.

[SugarBoxing]

Current version of Broner - yes

[Fenster]

There was never any misunderstanding about THE champion at 140, Hatton took it from Tszyu, Cotto was nothing more than a belt holder at 140.

[Beanz]

On neutral territory, not a snowball's chance in hell. Hatton was a lower B level fighter.. He dont have a chance.

If Hatton was a lower B level fighter then your chum Fury doesn't even make the alphabet.
Somewhere around -Z I should think.

[chinchekked]

I'm not a huge fan of any one of these guys, but call me crazy I say Hatton grinds him down late especially at 140. I think even the Hatton that lost to Mayweather beats Broner because he can be hit and Ricky had his moments when he was relentless and that was against a much better defensive fighter in Mayweather so I think the success he would have in hitting Broner would only motivate him more to keep it coming. I think Broner has a lot of tools to be a darn good fighter but I think that he can be "mugged" and roughed up by fighter who can come with a relentless approach to make it ugly. I say Hatton wins one of those ugly decision that has people arguing about who imposed their will...blah blah blah, but a Hatton win no less.