Re: David Haye vs. Tomaz Adamek.

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
erics44

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Haye by ko. He pretty much dominated the division.
Really!?
What world class fighters did he beat at cruiser?
Mormeck...
He beat Macaranelli but thats been shown to be worth nothing
He also likes to repeat that he was the u disputed cruiser champ, bullshit! How coupd he be when there was another belt holder?
He didnt want to go anywhere near Cunningham who held the IBF title.
He also had ONeil Bell, Adamek, Braithwaite, Rothman, Davis etc
He had plenty of people to beat to "dominate" the division. Beating Mormeck who had been knocked out a couple of fights previous then fighting Macaranelli is hardly dominating the division.
His whole career has revolved around moving to heavy because him and Booth had seen Haye hurt British level heavies in sparring.
ha, mate
whether or not your point is right or wrong you have to admit your response is a bit funny
Why?
When you "dominate" a division you beat the majority of the fighters in that division.
Like Wlad has done, or Mike Tyson did or even Lennox Lewis. Haye could never be considered as dominant in the cruiser division. Thompson beat him and there were fighters he never faced. Everyone pretty mch agrees that Macaranelli is only a good euro level fighter but not a world class level. If Haye had fought and beat Cunningham then id give him tons more credit and if he did and he won, he could actually call himself the former undisputed cruiser champ.
that middleweight knocked him over too, what was he called?
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Bookmarks