Most folks have him between 6 to 15. I can put him there. MY all-time list, and you can shit on it if you wish:
1. Ali
2. Louis
3. Jack Johnson
4. Larry Holmes
5. Mike Tyson
6. Lennox Lewis
7. Evander Holyfield
8. Jack Dempsey
9. VITALI Klitchsko
10. Wladimir Klitschko
I always have and always will place Vitali over Wladimir. That's just me. I sincerely believe that in the respective guys prime, all of them, would beat Wladimir- from Ali to Tyson to his own brother.
Bigger man George, bigger punch!
Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
Hidden Content
God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!
This is so damn subjective.... depends on the criteria you use. The opening post did say "based on what he's done so far". So if you're talking purely about numbers, it's hard not to rank Wladimir either in, or near the top 5. But is that a good criteria?
If you're gonna rank all-time HW's, I'd make sure to use some of these other criteria:
On "level of opposition" and "fan excitement", Wlad falls way way down. How much has he done for the sport? Depends who you ask, I guess. Globally, he's probably done a lot of good, as people were probably ready for a dominant HW who wasn't American. But then, that very fact seems to have drained some of the interest out of the U.S. Sad, but true.
- How much they did for the sport
- Level of opposition
- Excitement for the fans
- Longevity
- Dominance
Taking everything into consideration, and if forced to make a choice, I'd probably rank Wlad just inside the top 10, or just outside of it. Somewhere between 8 and 12.
Years ago there was only one champion and he had to fight all comers to hold on to his title. Wlad hasnt done this.
I'm not fond of Wlad as a champion either, ross. But in all honesty, who has he ducked?
It's not like he's got a conga line of worthy opponents waiting outside the door.
My frustration for years has been that the press builds up these lumps of crap.... they step into the ring, and promptly proceed to stink it up for all the world to see (and cringe).... and it's on to the next lump of crap. Over and over and over and over and over again. It's a nauseating process.
Wladimir won every minute of every round against Puritty, until he ran out of gas. He was trying too hard for the KO, trying to impress his family and friends, fighting for the first time in his hometown of Kiev, UA.
Wlad was also dominating Brewster, until once again, he tried too hard to KO him and ran out of gas. Sanders he underestimated, at that time he was becoming bored with fighting fringe contenders and wanted a crack at Lennox Lewis.
Personally I'm not gonna blame them for not fighting each other. But to me it makes no difference. There hasn't been anybody worthy to challenge and bring the best out of Wlad. The division is as crap as it's ever been in history. Challengers come in scared, or clueless as to how to attack Wlad. In those rare instances when someone does try to rise to the challenge, such as Povetkin, we're treated to clinch-filled, foul-filled, safety-first borefest which does nothing to improve Wlad's image among the fans.
Chambers was doing well but still just too small and didnt move his head much. He let his hands go and landed and at times made Wlad look silly. Chambers made Wlad look prime for the picking for soeone like Ali or Tyson who would give so much movement and more than one punch at a time. Holyfield would get in there and work but hes not hard to hit and watching the Lewis and Foreman fights he just wouldnt be powerfull enough to keep Wlad away.
Prime Tyson would've given prime Wlad HEAPS of trouble. No doubt about that. People point to the Douglas fight... but prime Tyson could take a punch and he was always forcing his way in. He would willingly take a couple of punches just so he could get inside and throw his murderous straight shots and hooks. Wlad has always used his long arms to keep his opponents away from his chin. Tyson would've brushed off those attempts and gotten inside Wlad's guard. Once inside all it would take would be one punch.
and if you think that brewster was a solid HW then your standards are outrageously low.
after the wlad fight he should have lost to kali meehan which would have easily been the worst fighter to have ever hold a HW title. he was worthless. brewster just got lucky the judges gave him that fight. then he got beat handily beat liakovick. and dont forget that before the wlad fight, he fought all no name fighters except clifford etienne who was an up and coming fighting and he beat brewster. we found out soon after that etienne was worthless too. so no, brewster was not a solid HW. he was terrible.
God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks