Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
I'm not down with rule changes at all. It is referee changes that are necessary. Will Howard Foster have to stand in front of someone and explain his actions now the mood has calmed after fight night??
In my opinion, inexperience beat Groves on Saturday. He boxed tremendously and made Froch look even more silly than Dirrell and Ward made him look. He didn't stick to the game plan that was working, using footwork and sharp counters, and rather than duck out from the ropes as he'd done earlier in the fight, beautifully I might add, he traded with wide shots against the ropes. He also could have taken a knee to gather his thoughts, rather than let pride get in the way of a great game plan and go toe to toe. Groves IMO also looks to be the hardest hitter at 168, so in combination with his boxing skills he'd take most if not all. Only other guy I see him struggling with, Ward aside, is Bika.
So all in all, I think groves will have learned an incredible amount from Saturday, comes out with his head held VERY high indeed, and I would like to think he won't make the same mistake again, but saying that, he does like to go toe to toe in pockets in the fight, so maybe that's just in his make up and will always have that vulnerability. He just needs to learn that that vulnerability will cost him fights against a guy like Froch who is near damn impossible to get out of there and will still come strong in patches in the championship rounds.
Last edited by TheMacMagician; 11-27-2013 at 09:52 AM.
people keep saying why didnt he take a knee
why should he take a knee, you take a knee when you are hurt and need a breather and you have no other option, from what i saw it hadnt got to that stage
if the ref hadnt have been in the way he'd have moved to the other side of the ring and continued figting
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Array
The problem with Groves taking a knee is losing points and giving the red flag to Froch that he is hurt.
Groves is inexperienced. Just like Price was, at facing strong opponents who can push him. The Anderson fight was invaluable for him but up coming fighters need to face quality tested opponents that dont get inocked out who will be there in the last few rounds to test their stamina and resolve and teach them how to cope.
Maybe it did come too early for Groves. He needed a fight with someone he was almost guaranteed not to KO.
I think the stoppage was early. Now the 8 count has been mentioned it is annoying that in the very same fight one fighter was given the privilege of a standing count but his opponent wasnt. Being realistic, would Groves had enou about him to last those final rounds? I dont know what Carls energy levels were like at that point. He was doing more because Groves was doing less and the end could have been inevitable.
This might be oddly a good thing for George, invaluable experience learnt for any rematch or future fights. He will have to learn some of Wards horrible spoiling skills to stop Carls momentum in a rematch.
Would Groves have got the stoppage had it not been for the 8 count in the first? Maybe not becuase even if he dropped Carl again he probably lasts to the end of the round as the clock ticks away.
Array
I think the ref has the discretion to administer an 8 count if he thinks that the ropes were the only thing keeping a fighter upright. That wasn't the case in the Groves fight, but for Bute the ropes were sagging under his weight. Just saying the the ref's counter to that is that he thought Bute would have gone down without the support of the ropes, which is a marginally different thing to a standing 8.
Nonetheless, I reckon Groves should have had more time considering the fact that he was winning the fight, but he was in a position where he could have taken a knee and if he rallied for two out of the last three would still have won. I think he deserves a rematch, and his style would cause Froch further problems again. Ward seems keen on a Froch rematch, but I don't think Ward's style is good for Froch either.
WHY SHOULD GROVES HAVE GOT A STANDING 8 COUNT AND WHY SHOULD HE HAVE TAKEN A KNEE?
as far as i can see the fight hadnt got to that point
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Array
Whether he was hurt or not, he was showing signs of distress, falling back and covering up and had taken flush shots. Regardless, it was a quick stoppage but how does anyone define quick?
The refs job is to protect both fighters and it is left up to his discretion to decide when he thinks any fighter has to be protected. Yes I agree it was quick. If all fights were stopped as quick, Gatti Ward and Corralles Castillio would not have been the fghts they were.
Groves needs to learn now that he has to bluff that hes in total control. Rather than put gloves up in his face and bounce off the ropes like Bute did, grab Froch, turn him, anything to keep the ref at bay or even to get the ref to intervene and buy time.
It was stopped quick but how quick? It may have only been another shot or two but really its Groves fault for giving any reason for the ref to do what Froch and Hearn wanted him to.
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Array
We will never know now but there is the possibility that when the ref grabbed George he was going to administer an 8 count but when he felt Georges weight sag in to him he decided to stop it. I still dont agree with it but because things like a fighters wellfare and scoring are a matter of opinion judges and refs are left to give their opinion and we can moan but if you look hurt a ref can stop you.
yes it was a bad stoppage but it was made in a split second but a human who made a mistake, fair enough
still, why should groves have taken a knee or got an 8 count any less or any more than being stopped
he was still well in a fight that could have gone either way
i wouldnt take a knee in a fight i was winning when i wasnt in distress, nor would i expect an 8 count, nor would i expect to be stopped
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks