Pac beats Tito Trinidad at 147

[Violent Demise]

What I did not like was the fact that Whitaker, Quartey and Tito would not fight another until ODH came and smash their cartel.

Which means what, M?

Here's the fact I personally find amusing:

Common Opponents

Camacho: .....Trinidad - Jan '94 - UD12 ............ DLH - Sept '97 - UD12

Campas: ......Trinidad - Sept '94 - TKO 4 (Campas undefeated at the time) ....... DLH - May '03 - TKO 7

Carr: ............Trinidad - Dec '94 - TKO 8 (Carr undefeated at the time) .......... DLH - May '99 - TKO 11



(eerie string at that point of alphabetical order )



Vargas: .........Trinidad - Dec '00 - TKO 12 (Vargas undefeated at the time) ............ DLH - Sept '02 - TKO 11

Mayorga: .......Trinidad - Oct '04 - TKO 8 ................. DLH - May '06 - TKO 6



Hence, the "leftovers theory".

De La Hoya just beat them better

Camacho: Both go 12. De La Hoya floors Camacho and damn near has him out. Trinidad didn't come close to stopping Camacho

Campas: Trinidad floored and hurt by Campas. De La Hoya dominates him

Carr: Trinidad hurt and floored by Carr. De La Hoya has minor problems with him

Vargas: Trinidad floored, hurt and forced to use a low blow against Vargas. De La Hoya doesn't have as much trouble against Vargas

Mayorga: Trinidad floored by Mayorga. De La Hoya has no trouble with him

of course he did "better" he fought them at least two years after Trinidad fucked all of the above up, and after Trinidad RUINED both Campas and Vargas, DLH lost to Whitaker, Trinidad beat the living snot out of him, and you can't say shit cause I'm using the same retarded ass logic that you have, cause I know that DLH was in there with Whitaker when he had more left in the tank.....2 yrs prior

So now a loss means a fighter is ruined right? So going by your moronic logic Mayorga had already ruined by Cory Spinks prior to facing Trinidad, right? Wrong stupid. Vargas and Campas both won titles after supposedly being ruined by Trinidad.

[ElTerribleMorales]

What I did not like was the fact that Whitaker, Quartey and Tito would not fight another until ODH came and smash their cartel.

Which means what, M?

Here's the fact I personally find amusing:

Common Opponents

Camacho: .....Trinidad - Jan '94 - UD12 ............ DLH - Sept '97 - UD12

Campas: ......Trinidad - Sept '94 - TKO 4 (Campas undefeated at the time) ....... DLH - May '03 - TKO 7

Carr: ............Trinidad - Dec '94 - TKO 8 (Carr undefeated at the time) .......... DLH - May '99 - TKO 11



(eerie string at that point of alphabetical order )



Vargas: .........Trinidad - Dec '00 - TKO 12 (Vargas undefeated at the time) ............ DLH - Sept '02 - TKO 11

Mayorga: .......Trinidad - Oct '04 - TKO 8 ................. DLH - May '06 - TKO 6



Hence, the "leftovers theory".

De La Hoya just beat them better

Camacho: Both go 12. De La Hoya floors Camacho and damn near has him out. Trinidad didn't come close to stopping Camacho

Campas: Trinidad floored and hurt by Campas. De La Hoya dominates him

Carr: Trinidad hurt and floored by Carr. De La Hoya has minor problems with him

Vargas: Trinidad floored, hurt and forced to use a low blow against Vargas. De La Hoya doesn't have as much trouble against Vargas

Mayorga: Trinidad floored by Mayorga. De La Hoya has no trouble with him

of course he did "better" he fought them at least two years after Trinidad fucked all of the above up, and after Trinidad RUINED both Campas and Vargas, DLH lost to Whitaker, Trinidad beat the living snot out of him, and you can't say shit cause I'm using the same retarded ass logic that you have, cause I know that DLH was in there with Whitaker when he had more left in the tank.....2 yrs prior

So now a loss means a fighter is ruined right? So going by your moronic logic Mayorga had already ruined by Cory Spinks prior to facing Trinidad, right? Wrong stupid. Vargas and Campas both won titles after supposedly being ruined by Trinidad.

yea paper titles against who? oh that's right the likes of Raul Marquez and Shibata Flores , bitch please, Martinez whooped the fuck out of Chavez Jr and still hasn't loss and you tried playing up that Silver Spoon Jr ruined him, but the difference is when I say it, it's true, Campas QUIT every fight he started getting his ass beat after the thrashing that Trinidad gave him, and well Vargas? well Trinidad busted him up so bad that his ass went running crying to the locker room before he could even get interviewed, and then couldn't even get by DLH even with the help of steroids, get off the smack buddy it's fucking up your double standard brain

[Mr140]

Still don't see the problem with Oscar fighting them later then Tito he was not even in the division yet when Tito was fighting them. Also when they meet Oscar gave Tito a boxing lesson and was robbed so i don't think Tito needed to weaken opponents for him. Oscar took on Mosley and Ike as well he would fight anyone so i don't get your logic about Oscar Titofan he fought big names they were still big names. As for Chavez jr why are we bringing him up into this just a spoiled rich boy wastes talent.

[Violent Demise]

What I did not like was the fact that Whitaker, Quartey and Tito would not fight another until ODH came and smash their cartel.

Which means what, M?

Here's the fact I personally find amusing:

Common Opponents

Camacho: .....Trinidad - Jan '94 - UD12 ............ DLH - Sept '97 - UD12

Campas: ......Trinidad - Sept '94 - TKO 4 (Campas undefeated at the time) ....... DLH - May '03 - TKO 7

Carr: ............Trinidad - Dec '94 - TKO 8 (Carr undefeated at the time) .......... DLH - May '99 - TKO 11



(eerie string at that point of alphabetical order )



Vargas: .........Trinidad - Dec '00 - TKO 12 (Vargas undefeated at the time) ............ DLH - Sept '02 - TKO 11

Mayorga: .......Trinidad - Oct '04 - TKO 8 ................. DLH - May '06 - TKO 6



Hence, the "leftovers theory".

De La Hoya just beat them better

Camacho: Both go 12. De La Hoya floors Camacho and damn near has him out. Trinidad didn't come close to stopping Camacho

Campas: Trinidad floored and hurt by Campas. De La Hoya dominates him

Carr: Trinidad hurt and floored by Carr. De La Hoya has minor problems with him

Vargas: Trinidad floored, hurt and forced to use a low blow against Vargas. De La Hoya doesn't have as much trouble against Vargas

Mayorga: Trinidad floored by Mayorga. De La Hoya has no trouble with him

of course he did "better" he fought them at least two years after Trinidad fucked all of the above up, and after Trinidad RUINED both Campas and Vargas, DLH lost to Whitaker, Trinidad beat the living snot out of him, and you can't say shit cause I'm using the same retarded ass logic that you have, cause I know that DLH was in there with Whitaker when he had more left in the tank.....2 yrs prior

So now a loss means a fighter is ruined right? So going by your moronic logic Mayorga had already ruined by Cory Spinks prior to facing Trinidad, right? Wrong stupid. Vargas and Campas both won titles after supposedly being ruined by Trinidad.

yea paper titles against who? oh that's right the likes of Raul Marquez and Shibata Flores , bitch please, Martinez whooped the fuck out of Chavez Jr and still hasn't loss and you tried playing up that Silver Spoon Jr ruined him, but the difference is when I say it, it's true, Campas QUIT every fight he started getting his ass beat after the thrashing that Trinidad gave him, and well Vargas? well Trinidad busted him up so bad that his ass went running crying to the locker room before he could even get interviewed, and then couldn't even get by DLH even with the help of steroids, get off the smack buddy it's fucking up your double standard brain

You're a fucking idiot. And you don't know shit about boxing. I'm a go slowly. So hopefully you're dumb ass can keep up while I destroy your Trinidad ruined Campas nonsense. Before fighting Trinidad, Campas had never won anything. In fact the best fighter he had beaten was Jorge Vaca. Vaca who at his best was only a B fighter was about 70 years old when Campas beat him. So after supposedly being ruined by Trinidad, Campas not only became champion but also when on to beat better fighters than he had beaten prior to facing Trinidad. So how exactly was he ruined?

Game. Set. Match

[La Cucaracha]

Tito over Pac in a massacre

[ElTerribleMorales]

What I did not like was the fact that Whitaker, Quartey and Tito would not fight another until ODH came and smash their cartel.

Which means what, M?

Here's the fact I personally find amusing:

Common Opponents

Camacho: .....Trinidad - Jan '94 - UD12 ............ DLH - Sept '97 - UD12

Campas: ......Trinidad - Sept '94 - TKO 4 (Campas undefeated at the time) ....... DLH - May '03 - TKO 7

Carr: ............Trinidad - Dec '94 - TKO 8 (Carr undefeated at the time) .......... DLH - May '99 - TKO 11



(eerie string at that point of alphabetical order )



Vargas: .........Trinidad - Dec '00 - TKO 12 (Vargas undefeated at the time) ............ DLH - Sept '02 - TKO 11

Mayorga: .......Trinidad - Oct '04 - TKO 8 ................. DLH - May '06 - TKO 6



Hence, the "leftovers theory".

De La Hoya just beat them better

Camacho: Both go 12. De La Hoya floors Camacho and damn near has him out. Trinidad didn't come close to stopping Camacho

Campas: Trinidad floored and hurt by Campas. De La Hoya dominates him

Carr: Trinidad hurt and floored by Carr. De La Hoya has minor problems with him

Vargas: Trinidad floored, hurt and forced to use a low blow against Vargas. De La Hoya doesn't have as much trouble against Vargas

Mayorga: Trinidad floored by Mayorga. De La Hoya has no trouble with him

of course he did "better" he fought them at least two years after Trinidad fucked all of the above up, and after Trinidad RUINED both Campas and Vargas, DLH lost to Whitaker, Trinidad beat the living snot out of him, and you can't say shit cause I'm using the same retarded ass logic that you have, cause I know that DLH was in there with Whitaker when he had more left in the tank.....2 yrs prior

So now a loss means a fighter is ruined right? So going by your moronic logic Mayorga had already ruined by Cory Spinks prior to facing Trinidad, right? Wrong stupid. Vargas and Campas both won titles after supposedly being ruined by Trinidad.

yea paper titles against who? oh that's right the likes of Raul Marquez and Shibata Flores , bitch please, Martinez whooped the fuck out of Chavez Jr and still hasn't loss and you tried playing up that Silver Spoon Jr ruined him, but the difference is when I say it, it's true, Campas QUIT every fight he started getting his ass beat after the thrashing that Trinidad gave him, and well Vargas? well Trinidad busted him up so bad that his ass went running crying to the locker room before he could even get interviewed, and then couldn't even get by DLH even with the help of steroids, get off the smack buddy it's fucking up your double standard brain

You're a fucking idiot. And you don't know shit about boxing. I'm a go slowly. So hopefully you're dumb ass can keep up while I destroy your Trinidad ruined Campas nonsense. Before fighting Trinidad, Campas had never won anything. In fact the best fighter he had beaten was Jorge Vaca. Vaca who at his best was only a B fighter was about 70 years old when Campas beat him. So after supposedly being ruined by Trinidad, Campas not only became champion but also when on to beat better fighters than he had beaten prior to facing Trinidad. So how exactly was he ruined?

Game. Set. Match

lol it was just a coincidence that he would quit every fight that he would bleed or get hit in after the Trinidad fight haha, funny as fuck how you're trying to build up a dude who QUIT in most of his losses yet you express such disdain for other fighters that you consider "quitters", just another example of your biased logic

CHECKMATE

[TitoFan]

Oops...... damn! Did I post that? Must've slipped out.

[FinitoElDinamita]

Oscar was old and weight drained dude. Talk about reaching

[TitoFan]

I don't give a FUCK. He QUIT.

But never mind. Do you like this one better?




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWtyLTKj2-w
















Was he old and weight-drained too?